Jakab G J, Spannhake E W, Canning B J, Kleeberger S R, Gilmour M I
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Mar;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):77-89. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s277.
A review of the literature reveals that ozone (O3) exposure can either suppress or enhance immune responsiveness. These disparate effects elicited by O3 exposure depend, in large part, on the experimental design used, the immune parameters examined as well as the animal species studied. Despite the apparent contradictions, a general pattern of response to O3 exposure can be recognized. Most studies indicate that continuous O3 exposure leads to an early (days 0-3) impairment of immune responsiveness followed, with continued exposures, by a form of adaptation to O3 that results in a re-establishment of the immune response. The effects of O3 exposure on the response to antigenic stimulation also depend on the time at which O3 exposure occurred. Whereas O3 exposure prior to immunization is without effect on the response to antigen, O3 exposure subsequent to immunization suppresses the response to antigen. Although most studies have focused on immune responses in the lung, numerous investigators have provided functional and anatomical evidence to support the hypothesis that O3 exposure can have profound effects on systemic immunity.
文献综述表明,暴露于臭氧(O₃)可能会抑制或增强免疫反应性。O₃暴露引发的这些不同效应在很大程度上取决于所采用的实验设计、所检测的免疫参数以及所研究的动物物种。尽管存在明显的矛盾,但对O₃暴露的一般反应模式是可以识别的。大多数研究表明,持续暴露于O₃会导致免疫反应性在早期(第0 - 3天)受损,随着持续暴露,会出现一种对O₃的适应性,从而导致免疫反应的重新建立。O₃暴露对抗抗原刺激反应的影响也取决于O₃暴露发生的时间。免疫前暴露于O₃对抗抗原的反应没有影响,而免疫后暴露于O₃则会抑制对抗抗原的反应。尽管大多数研究集中在肺部的免疫反应,但许多研究者已经提供了功能和解剖学证据来支持O₃暴露可对全身免疫产生深远影响这一假说。