• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A regional poison control system. Effect on response to hypothetical poisonings.

作者信息

Marcus S M, Chafee-Bahamon C, Arnold V W, Lovejoy F H

出版信息

Am J Dis Child. 1984 Nov;138(11):1010-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140490010002.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140490010002
PMID:6496417
Abstract

Poisoning of young children frequently results in parents seeking help. Parents either telephone for poison treatment information or go directly to a physician's office, hospital clinic, or emergency room. To determine if a regional poison control system reduces the inappropriate use of medical treatment services, parents attending suburban and inner-city clinics were presented hypothetical pediatric poisoning episodes and asked how they would respond. Parents living in a state serviced by a regional poison information center (Massachusetts) telephoned for information significantly more often and consequently used medical treatment services 19% less than did parents living in a state with only local poison information centers (New Jersey). In both states, inner-city populations went for care whereas suburban populations called. Both inner-city and suburban populations responded to a regional poison center but to a different extent. More severe ingestions tended to increase the use of the regional center by the Massachusetts suburban population, whereas other populations tended to use even more direct services.

摘要

相似文献

1
A regional poison control system. Effect on response to hypothetical poisonings.
Am J Dis Child. 1984 Nov;138(11):1010-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140490010002.
2
Effectiveness of a regional poison center in reducing excess emergency room visits for children's poisonings.地区中毒控制中心在减少儿童中毒急诊室就诊过量方面的有效性。
Pediatrics. 1983 Aug;72(2):164-9.
3
Health care cost effects of public use of a regional poison control center.公众使用区域毒物控制中心对医疗保健成本的影响。
West J Med. 1995 Jun;162(6):499-504.
4
2005 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' national poisoning and exposure database.美国中毒控制中心协会2005年全国中毒与暴露数据库年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(6-7):803-932. doi: 10.1080/15563650600907165.
5
An expanded emergency service: role of telephone services in the emergency department.扩展的急诊服务:电话服务在急诊科中的作用
Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Dec;9(12):617-23. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80473-2.
6
Emergency department poisoning visits in children younger than 6 years: comparing referrals by a regional poison control center to referrals by other sources.6岁以下儿童急诊科中毒就诊情况:比较地区中毒控制中心的转诊与其他来源的转诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c07a.
7
Does prearrival communication from a poison center to an emergency department decrease time to activated charcoal for pediatric poisoning?毒物控制中心与急诊科之间的到达前沟通能否减少小儿中毒患者给予活性炭的时间?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1045-51. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235ea02.
8
Prevention of childhood poisoning: efficacy of an educational program carried out in an emergency clinic.儿童中毒的预防:在急诊诊所开展的一项教育项目的效果
Pediatrics. 1987 Sep;80(3):359-63.
9
Poisoning prevention education during emergency department visits for childhood poisoning.儿童中毒急诊就诊期间的中毒预防教育。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 May;20(5):281-4. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000125654.20443.33.
10
Underreporting of fatal cases to a regional poison control center.向区域中毒控制中心漏报致命病例。
West J Med. 1995 Jun;162(6):505-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Poisoning hospitalization correlates with poison center call frequency.中毒住院与中毒控制中心的呼叫频率相关。
J Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep;4(3):151-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03161193.
2
Health care cost effects of public use of a regional poison control center.公众使用区域毒物控制中心对医疗保健成本的影响。
West J Med. 1995 Jun;162(6):499-504.