Allan J A, Docherty A J, Barker P J, Huskisson N S, Reynolds J J, Murphy G
Cell and Molecular Biology Department, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, U.K.
Biochem J. 1995 Jul 1;309 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):299-306. doi: 10.1042/bj3090299.
Matrix sequestration of matrix metalloproteinases may be important for the facilitation of remodelling events and the migration of cells through the extracellular matrix. Using an ELISA technique we studied the ability of pro and active forms of gelatinases A and B (GLA and GLB) to bind to matrix components and the contribution made by the different enzyme domains. Pro and active forms of GLA and GLB bound to type-I and type-IV collagens, gelatin and laminin films. Binding to collagens occurred exclusively via the N-terminal portion of the molecule in both of the gelatinases; deletion of the fibronectin-like domain in GLA abolished binding. Fibronectin was shown to compete with GLA, confirming that binding occurs through this domain. GLA and GLB competed for binding to collagen type I, whereas collagenase and stromelysin bound to different sites and could be co-localized with the gelatinases. We conclude that gelatinases have different binding specificities from those previously documented for stromelysin and collagenase, which bind through their C-terminal domains to collagen fibrils.
基质金属蛋白酶的基质隔离对于促进重塑事件以及细胞通过细胞外基质的迁移可能很重要。我们使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术研究了明胶酶A和B(GLA和GLB)的前体形式和活性形式与基质成分结合的能力以及不同酶结构域的作用。GLA和GLB的前体形式和活性形式与I型和IV型胶原、明胶和层粘连蛋白膜结合。两种明胶酶均仅通过分子的N端部分与胶原结合;GLA中纤连蛋白样结构域的缺失消除了结合。已证明纤连蛋白与GLA竞争,证实结合是通过该结构域发生的。GLA和GLB竞争与I型胶原的结合,而胶原酶和基质溶素结合到不同位点,并可与明胶酶共定位。我们得出结论,明胶酶具有与先前记录的基质溶素和胶原酶不同的结合特异性,后者通过其C端结构域与胶原纤维结合。