Xia T, Akers K, Eisen A Z, Seltzer J L
Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Apr 16;1293(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(95)00259-6.
The gelatinases (type IV collagenases) are members of the matrix metalloproteinase family that not only have a high degree of structural homology but are known to be nearly identical in their digestion profile against macromolecular substrates. We have shown previously that the preferred cleavage sites in the hydrolysis of type I gelatin, catalyzed by gelatinase A (72 kDa type IV collagenase), are bracketed by hydroxyproline in the P5 and P5' positions. In this report, a kinetic investigation using a series of collagenous dodecylpeptides in which the P5 and P5' hydroxyprolines were systematically varied and used as substrates for recombinant human gelatinase A, we show that replacement with either proline or alanine always resulted in increased Km. In contrast, substitution of the hydroxylated amino acids tyrosine and serine at P5 and P5' reduced the Km significantly, indicating that the hydroxyl moiety of the hydroxyproline is the functional group responsible for favorable enzyme-substrate affinity. This was shown by the kcat/Km ratio, which was doubled by the substitution of serine in that site. Cleavage of the same series of dodecylpeptides by recombinant human gelatinase B (92 kDa type IV collagenase) showed a very different kinetic profile for which no patterns were discernible. In subsequent comparisons of the two enzymes, it was found that gelatinase B cleaved the thiopeptolide substrate AcProLeuGly-S-LeuGly-OC2H5 at double the velocity of gelatinase A. In contrast, gelatinase A digested type I gelatin about 2.5-times faster than gelatinase B. SDS-PAGE analysis of gelatin cleavage products showed different patterns of product peptides for each enzyme. Further comparisons of the proteinases using synthetic peptide substrates with variations in size and in substituents at the P2' site again showed marked kinetic differences. Although these two matrix metalloproteinases seem similar in that they are both gelatinolytic and can degrade a nearly identical battery of macromolecular matrix components including type IV collagen, it is clear from these results that they are very different enzymatically. Since the regulatory portions of gelatinases A and B differ markedly, it has been assumed that the enzymes serve the same function, but respond to different stimuli. The differences in substrate specificity described herein suggest that their proposed physiological roles may require reevaluation.
明胶酶(IV型胶原酶)是基质金属蛋白酶家族的成员,它们不仅具有高度的结构同源性,而且已知在针对大分子底物的消化谱方面几乎相同。我们之前已经表明,由明胶酶A(72 kDa IV型胶原酶)催化的I型明胶水解中的优先切割位点,在P5和P5'位置被羟脯氨酸包围。在本报告中,我们使用一系列胶原十二肽进行动力学研究,其中P5和P5'羟脯氨酸被系统地改变并用作重组人明胶酶A的底物,结果表明用脯氨酸或丙氨酸替代总是导致Km增加。相反,在P5和P5'位置用羟基化氨基酸酪氨酸和丝氨酸替代显著降低了Km,这表明羟脯氨酸的羟基部分是负责良好酶 - 底物亲和力的官能团。这通过kcat/Km比值得以证明,该比值因在该位点用丝氨酸替代而增加了一倍。重组人明胶酶B(92 kDa IV型胶原酶)对同一系列十二肽的切割显示出非常不同的动力学谱,没有可辨别的模式。在随后对这两种酶的比较中,发现明胶酶B切割硫肽底物AcProLeuGly - S - LeuGly - OC2H5的速度是明胶酶A的两倍。相反,明胶酶A消化I型明胶的速度比明胶酶B快约2.5倍。明胶裂解产物的SDS - PAGE分析显示每种酶的产物肽模式不同。使用在P2'位点具有大小和取代基变化的合成肽底物对蛋白酶进行的进一步比较再次显示出明显的动力学差异。尽管这两种基质金属蛋白酶看起来相似,因为它们都具有明胶分解能力并且能够降解几乎相同的一系列大分子基质成分,包括IV型胶原,但从这些结果清楚地看出它们在酶学上非常不同。由于明胶酶A和B的调节部分明显不同,人们一直认为这两种酶具有相同的功能,但对不同的刺激做出反应。本文所述的底物特异性差异表明它们假定的生理作用可能需要重新评估。