Suppr超能文献

急性鼻窦炎中鼻窦X光片与计算机断层扫描的比较。

Comparison of sinus x-rays with computed tomography scans in acute sinusitis.

作者信息

Burke T F, Guertler A T, Timmons J H

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Ft. Lewis, WA 98431, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1994 May-Jun;1(3):235-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02437.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of sinus x-rays of patients clinically diagnosed as having acute sinusitis.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive adult, nonpregnant emergency department (ED) patients clinically diagnosed as having acute sinusitis and meeting study criteria were entered into the study. Sinus x-rays were obtained immediately after study entry and sinus computed tomography (CT) scans were done within 72 hours. Radiologic criteria for sinusitis were defined as more than 3 mm of mucoperiosteal thickening (MPT), an air/fluid (A/F) level, or opacification. All films were read in a blinded fashion [CT scans by two radiologists and plain film by two emergency medicine (EM) staff members and the same radiologists]. A third radiologist 'interpreted Ct scans when the initial radiologists disagreed.

RESULTS

Sinus CT scans were obtained for 29 of 30 patients. Radiologists interpreted 28 of 29 CT scans identically, with 21 being positive for sinusitis. Sensitivity and specificity of x-rays were 57% and 88%, 62% and 88%, 67% and 75%, and 48% and 100% for the two radiologists and the two EM physicians, respectively. Four ethmoid, five frontal, and five sphenoid sinuses were opacified or had A/F levels on CT scan. No ethmoid, frontal, or sphenoid sinus was interpreted as being opacified or having an A/F level on plain film. Sensitivity and specificity of maxillary sinus opacification or A/F level on x-ray were 70% and 100%, and 70% and 100%, and 70% and 96%, and 70% and 96% for the two radiologists and the two EM physicians, respectively. Mean concordances (kappa) of x-ray and CT scan interpretations for the four reviewers were 0.34 (range, 0.30-0.39) for the diagnosis of sinusitis and 0.77 (range, 0.74-0.79) for maxillary sinus opacification or A/F level.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinus x-rays are less sensitive than sinus CT scans for demonstration of radiographic changes consistent with acute sinusitis. Sinus plain films may not be reliable enough to assist with clinical decision making. If severity of patient illness requires diagnostic certainty, more sensitive imaging studies, such as CT scans of the sinuses, should be considered.

摘要

目的

确定临床诊断为急性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦X线检查的敏感性和特异性。

方法

连续纳入30例临床诊断为急性鼻窦炎且符合研究标准的成年非妊娠急诊科患者。研究开始后立即进行鼻窦X线检查,并在72小时内进行鼻窦计算机断层扫描(CT)。鼻窦炎的放射学标准定义为黏膜骨膜增厚(MPT)超过3mm、气液平面(A/F)或窦腔混浊。所有片子均采用盲法阅片[CT扫描由两名放射科医生阅片,平片由两名急诊医学(EM)工作人员和同两名放射科医生阅片]。当初始阅片的放射科医生意见不一致时,由第三名放射科医生解读CT扫描结果。

结果

30例患者中有29例进行了鼻窦CT扫描。放射科医生对29例CT扫描中的28例解读一致,其中21例鼻窦炎诊断为阳性。两名放射科医生和两名EM医生对X线检查的敏感性和特异性分别为57%和88%、62%和88%、67%和75%、48%和100%。CT扫描显示4个筛窦、5个额窦和5个蝶窦混浊或有气液平面。平片上未将任何筛窦、额窦或蝶窦解读为混浊或有气液平面。两名放射科医生和两名EM医生对上颌窦混浊或气液平面在X线检查中的敏感性和特异性分别为70%和100%、70%和100%、70%和96%、70%和96%。四位阅片者对X线和CT扫描解读在鼻窦炎诊断方面的平均一致性(kappa值)为0.34(范围0.30 - 0.39),在上颌窦混浊或气液平面方面为0.77(范围0.74 - 0.79)。

结论

鼻窦X线检查在显示与急性鼻窦炎相符的放射学改变方面不如鼻窦CT扫描敏感。鼻窦平片可能不够可靠,无法辅助临床决策。如果患者病情严重程度需要明确诊断,应考虑采用更敏感的影像学检查,如鼻窦CT扫描。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验