Moote C A
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Jun;42(6):453-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03011679.
Butscher describes a common-sense approach to pain management which is simple, safe and effective. A wide variety of national and international organization devoted to the management of pain have universally adopted these simple measures. Current guidelines advocate both regular dosing and rescue analgesia. These guidelines were produced by an army of international experts and have been available for a decade. Although the information is widely published, it is rarely adopted in clinical practice. It is any wonder that leaders in the field of pain management ask: "Is education enough?" "Will guidelines make a difference?" They continue to lament the "tragedy of needless pain" and in despair they have called for "national initiatives on pain." Bonica stated so elegantly, "for nearly 30 yr I have studied the reasons for inadequate management of postoperative pain, and they remain the same...inadequate or improper application of available information and therapies is certainly the most important reason for inadequate analgesia does not require futuristic high tech solutions. In fact, as the economic crunch continues we may find that we cannot afford some of these new, improved and more expensive techniques. If we can provide safe and effective analgesia for only pennies a day, this option cannot be ignored. The new way may be the old way.
布舍尔描述了一种简单、安全且有效的疼痛管理常识性方法。众多致力于疼痛管理的国内和国际组织都普遍采用了这些简单措施。当前指南提倡定期给药和急救镇痛。这些指南由一大批国际专家制定,已发布十年之久。尽管这些信息广泛传播,但在临床实践中却很少被采用。难怪疼痛管理领域的领导者会问:“教育是否足够?”“指南会有作用吗?”他们继续哀叹“不必要疼痛的悲剧”,并绝望地呼吁“国家疼痛倡议”。博尼卡说得很到位:“近30年来,我一直在研究术后疼痛管理不足的原因,这些原因依然未变……现有信息和疗法的应用不足或不当肯定是镇痛不足的最重要原因,并不需要未来主义的高科技解决方案。事实上,随着经济危机持续,我们可能会发现我们负担不起其中一些新的、改良的且更昂贵的技术。如果我们每天只需花费几便士就能提供安全有效的镇痛,这个选择就不能被忽视。新方法可能就是老方法。