Davey R B, Pound J M, Cooksey L M
US Department of Agriculture, Cattle Fever Tick Research Lab., Mission, Texas 78572, USA.
Exp Appl Acarol. 1994 Apr;18(4):185-200. doi: 10.1007/BF00114166.
The reproductive biology and nonparasitic development of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) and hybridized Boophilus ticks (B. annulatus (Say) male x B. microplus female) held under natural field conditions in south Texas throughout the year were compared. Comparisons between the two types of ticks indicated that the ovipositional biology (percentage of ovipositing females and number of eggs laid) of the females favored hybrid ticks during some months and B. microplus ticks during other months. However, on a year long basis, there was virtually no difference in the percentage of ovipositing females or in the number of eggs deposited by hybrid females as compared to B. microplus. The duration of each nonparasitic development period (preoviposition period, incubation period of eggs, and larval longevity) showed that both types of ticks had very similar developmental and survival rates during the year. Generally the difference in duration of each of the nonparasitic parameters was < 8 days, leading to a high degree of synchrony of the nonparasitic developmental rates between the two types of ticks. On the other hand, egg hatchability of hybrid ticks was consistently lower than pure-strain B. microplus throughout the year with significantly lower hatch rates occurring in April, July, August, October, and November. Thus, results obtained on percentage of ovipositing females, number of eggs laid, preoviposition period, incubation period of eggs, and larval longevity provide encouragement for the possible use of sterile hybrid males as a means of eliminating a native B. microplus population. In contrast, results of the egg hatchability of the two types of ticks indicate that the selective advantage afforded to B. microplus could have an adverse affect on the success of a sterile hybrid male program by making the number of hybrid ticks necessary to eliminate a native population prohibitively high.
对全年在得克萨斯州南部自然田间条件下饲养的微小牛蜱(Canestrini)以及杂交牛蜱(环形牛蜱(Say)雄性×微小牛蜱雌性)的生殖生物学和非寄生性发育进行了比较。两种蜱之间的比较表明,雌性蜱的产卵生物学特性(产卵雌性的百分比和产卵数量)在某些月份有利于杂交蜱,而在其他月份有利于微小牛蜱。然而,从全年来看,与微小牛蜱相比,杂交雌性蜱的产卵雌性百分比或产卵数量实际上没有差异。每个非寄生性发育阶段(产卵前期、卵的孵化期和幼虫寿命)的持续时间表明,两种蜱在一年中的发育和存活率非常相似。一般来说,每个非寄生性参数的持续时间差异小于8天,导致两种蜱的非寄生性发育速率高度同步。另一方面,杂交蜱的卵孵化率全年始终低于纯种微小牛蜱,在4月、7月、8月、10月和11月孵化率显著更低。因此,关于产卵雌性百分比、产卵数量、产卵前期、卵的孵化期和幼虫寿命的结果为使用不育杂交雄性作为消灭本地微小牛蜱种群的一种手段提供了可能性。相比之下,两种蜱的卵孵化率结果表明,微小牛蜱所具有的选择优势可能会对不育杂交雄性计划的成功产生不利影响,因为要消灭本地种群所需的杂交蜱数量会高得令人望而却步。