Schafer R
Int J Psychoanal. 1995 Apr;76 ( Pt 2):223-35.
This study of Heinz Hartmann's contributions emphasises change within continuity. Specifically, it is argued that he both integrated and changed significantly Freud's structural theory--his 'ego psychology'. This he did through his then-modern concept of adaptation. In turn, adaptation paved the way towards further change in the direction of current emphases on dialogue and intersubjectivity. These new developments have contributed beneficially to theory and clinical practice, but, like all new developments, they have introduced new problems, among them unreflective and undisciplined eclecticism. Consideration is given to the incompleteness inherent in theory construction. In psychoanalysis, the new, object-related developments require as a complement some version of the type of structural theorising initiated by Freud and developed to its highest point by Hartmann and his close collaborators particularly; in meeting that requirement, some version of an objectivist stance is also required to complement the subjectivism and pluralism of the newer developments. Throughout this appreciation of Hartmann's role in the history of psychoanalytic thought, an effort is made to undo the negative effects of misreadings that took his ideas on adaptation and ego psychology to mean an endorsement of superficial adjustment or conformity and an overvaluation of conscious mental processes.
这项对海因茨·哈特曼贡献的研究强调在连续性中的变化。具体而言,有人认为他既整合了弗洛伊德的结构理论——他的“自我心理学”,又对其进行了重大改变。他是通过当时的现代适应概念做到这一点的。反过来,适应为朝着当前对对话和主体间性的强调方向的进一步变化铺平了道路。这些新发展对理论和临床实践都有有益的贡献,但与所有新发展一样,它们也带来了新问题,其中包括不加反思和缺乏纪律的折衷主义。文中考虑了理论构建中固有的不完整性。在精神分析中,新的、与客体相关的发展需要某种版本的结构理论化作为补充,这种结构理论化最初由弗洛伊德发起,并由哈特曼及其亲密合作者特别是发展到了极致;在满足这一要求时,还需要某种版本的客观主义立场来补充新发展中的主观主义和多元主义。在对哈特曼在精神分析思想史上的作用的整个评价过程中,人们努力消除误读的负面影响,这些误读将他关于适应和自我心理学的观点误解为对表面调整或顺从的认可,以及对有意识心理过程的过度重视。