Defer C, Coste J, Descamps F, Voisin S, Lemaire J M, Maniez M, Couroucé A M
Centre Régionaux de Transfusion Sanguine, Lille, France.
Transfusion. 1995 Jul;35(7):596-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35795357884.x.
To verify the criteria for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) seropositivity in Western blot (WB) proposed by the Retrovirus Study Group of the French Society of Blood Transfusion, 186 blood donations that were repeatedly reactive in HTLV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, selected according to their WB pattern, were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA).
In two commercially available WBs, 12 samples were confirmed as positive (rgp21+p19+p24) and 174 were interpreted as indeterminate (one or two reactivities to these proteins). The primer pairs used for the PCR allowed the amplification of type I (HTLV-I) or type II (HTLV-II) (or both) sequences. The RIPA was performed with two 35S-labeled cell lines: HTLV-I infected HUT 102/B2 and HTLV-II-infected MoT.
Of the 12 positive samples, 11 were classified as HTLV-I-positive and one as HTLV-II-positive. Among the 174 indeterminate samples, three (WB pattern: rgp21+, p19+, p24-) were HTLV-I positive in PCR (one of them was positive in RIPA also); the other 171 were HTLV negative.
In the study of a population in which 97 percent of HTLV infections are due to HTLV-I, these data support the three-protein criteria (rgp21, p19, and p24) for a positive blot reading. No HTLV infection was observed when rgp21 did not react. Consequently, p19 and/or p24 band patterns represent false reactivity and do not require PCR or RIPA confirmation. To discriminate between false- and true-positive results in the absence of MTA-1 or K55 reactivity, PCR and/or RIPA is required only when rgp21 reactivity is associated with one gag band (p19 or p24).
为验证法国输血协会逆转录病毒研究小组提出的蛋白质印迹法(WB)检测人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒(HTLV)血清阳性的标准,根据WB模式选取186份在HTLV酶联免疫吸附测定中呈反复阳性的献血样本,采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和放射免疫沉淀测定(RIPA)进行检测。
在两种市售WB检测中,12份样本被确认为阳性(rgp21 + p19 + p24),174份被判定为不确定(对这些蛋白质有一或两种反应性)。用于PCR的引物对可扩增I型(HTLV-I)或II型(HTLV-II)(或两者)序列。RIPA检测采用两种35S标记的细胞系:HTLV-I感染的HUT 102/B2和HTLV-II感染的MoT。
在12份阳性样本中,11份被归类为HTLV-I阳性,1份为HTLV-II阳性。在174份不确定样本中,3份(WB模式:rgp21 +,p19 +,p24 -)PCR检测为HTLV-I阳性(其中1份RIPA检测也呈阳性);其他171份为HTLV阴性。
在97%的HTLV感染由HTLV-I引起的人群研究中,这些数据支持WB检测阳性判读的三蛋白标准(rgp21、p19和p24)。当rgp21无反应时,未观察到HTLV感染。因此,p19和/或p24条带模式代表假反应性,无需PCR或RIPA确认。在缺乏MTA-1或K55反应性的情况下,为区分假阳性和真阳性结果,仅当rgp21反应性与一条gag带(p19或p24)相关时才需要进行PCR和/或RIPA检测。