• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较

Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

作者信息

Vrielink H, Zaaijer H L, Reesink H W, Lelie P N, van der Poel C L

机构信息

Red Cross Blood Bank Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1995 Jul;35(7):601-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35795357885.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35795357885.x
PMID:7631395
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are now implemented in most laboratories in Europe, but have not yet been fully implemented in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two ELISAs (Ortho 3.0 and Ortho 2.0, Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) were compared by tests on various serum panels: A) blood donor samples (n = 530) that tested positive in first- or second-generation anti-HCV ELISA; B) samples from persons with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (n = 185); C) samples from multiply transfused patients (n = 79); D) samples from patients on hemodialysis (n = 473); and E) samples from Dutch random blood donors (n = 2153).

RESULTS

In panels A, B, and C, 247 (100%) of 247 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive and 278 (100%) of 278 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-positive specimens were detected by Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 (sensitivity, 100%). In the sera of panel D, used to represent a group of patients with a high risk for HCV, no additional positives were found by Ortho 3.0. In panel E, of 2153 blood donor samples, 2 (0.1%) were positive in Ortho 2.0 and 8 (0.4%) in Ortho 3.0. Two samples that were positive in both Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 were also positive in RIBA-2; one was positive on PCR. From the 6 remaining Ortho 3.0-positive (Ortho 2.0-negative) samples, 1 was positive in RIBA-2 (isolated anti-c100) and 3 were positive in third-generation RIBA (1/3 isolated anti-c100, 2/3 isolated NS5). All 6 samples were PCR negative. In first-time donors, no difference in specificity was found.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of the Ortho 3.0 ELISA are comparable to those of the Ortho 2.0 ELISA.

摘要

背景

第三代抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)目前已在欧洲的大多数实验室中采用,但在美国尚未完全普及。

研究设计与方法

通过对各种血清样本进行检测,比较了两种ELISA(Ortho 3.0和Ortho 2.0,Ortho诊断公司,拉里坦,新泽西州):A)在第一代或第二代抗HCV ELISA中检测呈阳性的献血者样本(n = 530);B)慢性非甲非乙型肝炎患者的样本(n = 185);C)多次输血患者的样本(n = 79);D)血液透析患者的样本(n = 473);以及E)荷兰随机献血者的样本(n = 2153)。

结果

在A、B和C组样本中,Ortho 2.0和3.0检测出247份聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性样本中的247份(100%)以及278份第二代重组免疫印迹试验(RIBA-2)阳性样本中的278份(100%)(灵敏度为100%)。在用于代表HCV高风险患者群体的D组血清中,Ortho 3.0未发现额外的阳性样本。在E组的2153份献血者样本中,Ortho 2.0检测出2份(0.1%)呈阳性,Ortho 3.0检测出8份(0.4%)呈阳性。在Ortho 2.0和3.0中均呈阳性的两份样本在RIBA-2中也呈阳性;其中一份在PCR检测中呈阳性。在其余6份Ortho 3.0阳性(Ortho 2.0阴性)样本中,1份在RIBA-2中呈阳性(孤立的抗c100),3份在第三代RIBA中呈阳性(1/3为孤立的抗c100,2/3为孤立的NS5)。所有6份样本的PCR检测均为阴性。在首次献血者中,未发现特异性存在差异。

结论

Ortho 3.0 ELISA的灵敏度和特异性与Ortho 2.0 ELISA相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.两种抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较
Transfusion. 1995 Jul;35(7):601-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35795357885.x.
2
Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: Wellcozyme VK45 and Ortho 2.0.两种抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较:Wellcozyme VK45和Ortho 2.0
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed. 1995 Jun;22(3):164-7. doi: 10.1159/000223117.
3
A comparison between one first generation and three second generation anti-HCV ELISAs: an investigation in high- and low-risk subjects in correlation with recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction.一种第一代和三种第二代抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较:在高危和低危人群中与重组免疫印迹法及聚合酶链反应相关的调查
J Virol Methods. 1992 Dec 1;40(3):287-96. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(92)90087-t.
4
Sensitivity and specificity of three third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus ELISAs.三种第三代抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法的敏感性和特异性
Vox Sang. 1995;69(1):14-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1995.tb00341.x.
5
New-generation RIBA hepatitis C strip immunoblot assays.新一代RIBA丙型肝炎条带免疫印迹检测法。
Beitr Infusionsther. 1992;30:17-33.
6
New generation RIBA hepatitis C strip immunoblot assays.新一代重组免疫印迹法丙型肝炎检测条
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1992;50(5):329-36.
7
Reliability of the third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay for hepatitis C virus.
Transfusion. 1995 Sep;35(9):745-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35996029158.x.
8
Increased detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant patients by third-generation assays.通过第三代检测方法提高肾移植患者丙型肝炎病毒抗体的检测率。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Sep;28(3):437-40. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90503-x.
9
Comparison of two second-generation anti-hepatitis C virus ELISA on 21431 US blood donor samples.两种第二代抗丙型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法对21431份美国献血者样本的比较。
J Viral Hepat. 1995;2(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.1995.tb00072.x.
10
Analysis of ELISA hepatitis C virus-positive blood donors population by polymerase chain reaction and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). Comparison of second and third generation RIBA.通过聚合酶链反应和重组免疫印迹分析(RIBA)对ELISA丙型肝炎病毒阳性献血者群体进行分析。第二代和第三代RIBA的比较。
Acta Virol. 1993 Apr-Jun;37(2-3):123-31.

引用本文的文献

1
PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation.通过器官移植减少人类免疫缺陷病毒、乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒传播的公共卫生服务指南。
Public Health Rep. 2013 Jul;128(4):247-343. doi: 10.1177/003335491312800403.
2
Automated RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) strip immunoblot assay for reproducible HCV diagnosis.用于可重复的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)诊断的自动化重组免疫印迹法(RIBA)丙肝病毒检测条
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Feb;36(2):387-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.2.387-390.1998.