Martin P, Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Quan S, Brezina M, Kaufman E, Sra K, DiNello R, Polito A, Gitnick G
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 90024-1749, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Feb;36(2):387-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.2.387-390.1998.
A comparison between the CHIRON RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) processor and manual systems was performed by using 88 specimens repeatedly reactive by the second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HCV 2.0 ELISA) and 111 random specimens from volunteer donors. For the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (SIA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA), test results correlated strongly between the manual and the automated runs (kappa value, 0.937). For the RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, the correlation of the test results was also high (kappa value, 0.899). Among the specimens with positive results by RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs, there was a very strong concordance of the test results between the manual and the automated runs with regard to the reactive bands. Nine samples had discordant results between the manual and the automated runs; this was probably attributable to increased variability in antigen scores close to the cutoff values for both tests. Run-to-run and within-run testing by the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System showed a very low rate of conflicting values. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs accurately with minimal operator involvement. In addition, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System shows excellent reproducibility, with the potential for operator-to-operator and site-to-site variability being greatly reduced. Our data indicate that this novel methodology may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of specimens repeatedly reactive by ELISA in routine clinical assessments and epidemiologic evaluations.
通过使用88份经第二代丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(HCV 2.0 ELISA)反复检测呈反应性的标本以及111份来自志愿者捐献者的随机标本,对CHIRON RIBA丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测系统与手工检测系统进行了比较。对于第二代RIBA HCV条带免疫印迹测定(SIA)(RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA),手工操作和自动化检测的结果之间具有很强的相关性(kappa值为0.937)。对于RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA,检测结果的相关性也很高(kappa值为0.899)。在RIBA HCV 2.0和3.0 SIA检测结果呈阳性的标本中,手工操作和自动化检测在反应条带方面的检测结果具有非常强的一致性。有9个样本在手工操作和自动化检测之间的结果不一致;这可能是由于两种检测接近临界值时抗原评分的变异性增加所致。CHIRON RIBA HCV检测系统的批间和批内检测显示冲突值的发生率非常低。总之,CHIRON RIBA HCV检测系统能够在操作人员参与最少的情况下准确地进行RIBA HCV 2.0和3.0 SIA检测。此外,CHIRON RIBA HCV检测系统显示出极好的可重复性,极大地降低了操作人员之间和不同检测地点之间的变异性。我们的数据表明,这种新方法对于常规临床评估和流行病学评价中经ELISA反复检测呈反应性的标本的补充抗HCV检测可能非常有用。