Schulte P A, Sweeney M H
Industrywide Studies Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):69-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s369.
Biomarkers are potentially powerful tools for use in research and regulation. Their derivation from biologic specimens collected from human subjects does, however, present many ethical implications. Ethical issues are relevant in almost each facet of human biomarker research studies: design, identification and recruitment of subjects, handling and use of the data, and interpretation and communication of results. Researchers also face a number of dilemmas when considering the use of human biologic specimens and new biomarkers. The mere fact that such markers are the result of measurements in human specimens gives the appearance of being more accurate than traditional sources of information such as questionnaires or environmental monitoring; yet, this may not always be the case. The meaning of the results of biomarker studies may be unclear because the purpose of the study is usually for research rather than clinical purposes. There generally are no established normal ranges for biomarkers and the interpretation of findings are often difficult. Researchers may not communicate these results to subjects or consider followup action because the task may be too difficult or undefined, or the reaction of the subject cannot be anticipated. A wide range of practices in this regard exists among researchers. Many questions remain unanswered about the use of biologic specimens. These include questions of ownership and access to specimens. Related to this is the question of whether specimens collected for one research purpose can be used for an entirely different research purpose. This is still an open question.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
生物标志物是用于研究和监管的潜在有力工具。然而,从人类受试者采集的生物标本中获取生物标志物,会带来许多伦理问题。伦理问题几乎涉及人类生物标志物研究的各个方面:研究设计、受试者的识别与招募、数据的处理与使用,以及结果的解读与传播。在考虑使用人类生物标本和新的生物标志物时,研究人员也面临诸多困境。仅仅因为这些标志物是在人类标本中测量的结果,就给人一种比问卷调查或环境监测等传统信息来源更准确的印象;然而,情况并非总是如此。生物标志物研究结果的意义可能不明确,因为研究目的通常是用于研究而非临床目的。生物标志物通常没有既定的正常范围,对研究结果的解读往往也很困难。研究人员可能不会将这些结果告知受试者,也不会考虑后续行动方案,因为这项任务可能太难或不明确,或者无法预料受试者的反应。研究人员在这方面存在广泛的做法差异。关于生物标本的使用,仍有许多问题没有答案。这些问题包括标本的所有权和获取问题。与此相关的是,为一个研究目的采集的标本是否可用于完全不同的研究目的。这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。(摘要截选至250词)