• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation.伦理考量、保密问题、人类受试者的权利以及研究与监管中监测数据的使用。
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):69-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s369.
2
Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?涉及人类受试者的研究中的伦理和法律问题:你想了解一下吗?
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;59(4):335-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.030957.
3
Ethics and law in research with human biological samples: a new approach.人类生物样本研究中的伦理与法律:一种新方法。
Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2014;29(1):61-3. doi: 10.1515/dmdi-2013-0055.
4
Research involving children: some ethical issues.涉及儿童的研究:一些伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(3):298-308. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne697oa.
5
Research on the socio-ethical impact of biomarker use and the communication processes in ECNIS NoE and NewGeneris IP.欧洲创新药物倡议(ECNIS)卓越网络和“新基因”知识产权中生物标志物使用的社会伦理影响及沟通流程研究。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 May;210(3-4):263-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
6
Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.现象学研究中的伦理考量
Nurse Res. 2007;14(3):36-45. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.04.14.3.36.c6031.
7
Archived specimens: a platform for discussion.存档标本:一个讨论的平台。
Community Genet. 1999;2(2-3):51-60. doi: 10.1159/000016187.
8
Ethical and legal issues in conducting research involving elderly subjects.涉及老年受试者的研究中的伦理和法律问题。
Behav Sci Law. 1995 Summer;13(3):319-35. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370130302.
9
Ethical and social issues in the use of biomarkers in epidemiological research.流行病学研究中生物标志物使用的伦理和社会问题。
IARC Sci Publ. 1997(142):313-8.
10
Ethical considerations of ensuring an informed and autonomous consent in research involving critically ill patients.在涉及重症患者的研究中确保知情且自主同意的伦理考量。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Sep;154(3 Pt 1):582-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810590.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical aspects of exposome research: a systematic review.暴露组研究的伦理问题:一项系统综述。
Exposome. 2023 Apr 12;3(1):osad004. doi: 10.1093/exposome/osad004.
2
Ethical Considerations in Sexual Health Research: A Narrative Review.性健康研究中的伦理考量:一项叙述性综述。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):157-166. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_60_17.
3
Factors Associated with Uptake of HIV Test Results in a Nationally Representative Population-Based AIDS Indicator Survey.在一项具有全国代表性的基于人群的艾滋病指标调查中与获取艾滋病毒检测结果相关的因素
Open AIDS J. 2014 Mar 7;8:7-16. doi: 10.2174/1874613601408010007. eCollection 2014.
4
Recommendations for biomonitoring of emergency responders: focus on occupational health investigations and occupational health research.应急响应人员生物监测建议:聚焦职业健康调查与职业健康研究。
Mil Med. 2013 Jan;178(1):68-75. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00173.
5
Closing the research loop: a risk-based approach for communicating results of air pollution exposure studies.闭合研究循环:一种基于风险的空气污染暴露研究结果传播方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):28-34. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6354.

本文引用的文献

1
On being an authentic scientist.论成为一名真正的科学家。
IRB. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):1-4.
2
Predictive identification of hypersusceptible individuals.超敏感个体的预测性识别。
J Occup Med. 1982 May;24(5):369-74. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198205000-00007.
3
Ethical issues in testing for differential sensitivity to occupational hazards.职业危害差异敏感性检测中的伦理问题。
J Occup Med. 1983 Nov;25(11):797-808.
4
A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham.弗雷明汉冠心病风险的多变量分析。
J Chronic Dis. 1967 Jul;20(7):511-24. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90082-3.
5
The potential usefulness of biological markers in risk assessment.生物标志物在风险评估中的潜在用途。
Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Dec;76:141-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8776141.
6
Validation of intermediate end points in cancer research.癌症研究中中间终点的验证
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Nov 21;82(22):1746-52. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.22.1746.
7
Molecular epidemiology and the genetics of environmental cancer.环境癌的分子流行病学与遗传学
JAMA. 1991 Aug 7;266(5):681-7.
8
ASPO Distinguished Achievement Award Lecture. Epidemiological studies using biological markers: issues for epidemiologists.美国石油峰值协会杰出成就奖讲座。使用生物标志物的流行病学研究:流行病学家面临的问题。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1991 Nov-Dec;1(1):13-9.
9
Biomarkers in epidemiology: scientific issues and ethical implications.流行病学中的生物标志物:科学问题与伦理影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 1992 Nov;98:143-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9298143.
10
The allure of genetic explanations.基因解释的吸引力。
BMJ. 1992 Sep 19;305(6855):666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6855.666.

伦理考量、保密问题、人类受试者的权利以及研究与监管中监测数据的使用。

Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation.

作者信息

Schulte P A, Sweeney M H

机构信息

Industrywide Studies Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):69-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s369.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.95103s369
PMID:7635115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1519015/
Abstract

Biomarkers are potentially powerful tools for use in research and regulation. Their derivation from biologic specimens collected from human subjects does, however, present many ethical implications. Ethical issues are relevant in almost each facet of human biomarker research studies: design, identification and recruitment of subjects, handling and use of the data, and interpretation and communication of results. Researchers also face a number of dilemmas when considering the use of human biologic specimens and new biomarkers. The mere fact that such markers are the result of measurements in human specimens gives the appearance of being more accurate than traditional sources of information such as questionnaires or environmental monitoring; yet, this may not always be the case. The meaning of the results of biomarker studies may be unclear because the purpose of the study is usually for research rather than clinical purposes. There generally are no established normal ranges for biomarkers and the interpretation of findings are often difficult. Researchers may not communicate these results to subjects or consider followup action because the task may be too difficult or undefined, or the reaction of the subject cannot be anticipated. A wide range of practices in this regard exists among researchers. Many questions remain unanswered about the use of biologic specimens. These include questions of ownership and access to specimens. Related to this is the question of whether specimens collected for one research purpose can be used for an entirely different research purpose. This is still an open question.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

生物标志物是用于研究和监管的潜在有力工具。然而,从人类受试者采集的生物标本中获取生物标志物,会带来许多伦理问题。伦理问题几乎涉及人类生物标志物研究的各个方面:研究设计、受试者的识别与招募、数据的处理与使用,以及结果的解读与传播。在考虑使用人类生物标本和新的生物标志物时,研究人员也面临诸多困境。仅仅因为这些标志物是在人类标本中测量的结果,就给人一种比问卷调查或环境监测等传统信息来源更准确的印象;然而,情况并非总是如此。生物标志物研究结果的意义可能不明确,因为研究目的通常是用于研究而非临床目的。生物标志物通常没有既定的正常范围,对研究结果的解读往往也很困难。研究人员可能不会将这些结果告知受试者,也不会考虑后续行动方案,因为这项任务可能太难或不明确,或者无法预料受试者的反应。研究人员在这方面存在广泛的做法差异。关于生物标本的使用,仍有许多问题没有答案。这些问题包括标本的所有权和获取问题。与此相关的是,为一个研究目的采集的标本是否可用于完全不同的研究目的。这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。(摘要截选至250词)