Guigui P, Chopin D
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1994;80(8):681-8.
The aim was to determine the usefulness of a flexible stabilization system associated with neural decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. 2 points were especially studied: low back pain at follow up and Graf system ability to prevent postoperative instability.
26 patients were screened retrospectively with an average follow up of 29 months. Clinical results were appreciated on the functional Beaujon's score. Preoperatively all of the patients had static and dynamic standard X-rays. The evaluation of sagital olisthesis was done by using displacement of the posterior border of the vertebral body (Wiltse and Winter method's). On the dynamic X-Rays we accepted as criteria of instability an olisthesis of 2 mm or more, an angular displacement equal or superior to 14.3 degrees in L2 L3, 15.5 degrees in L3 L4 and 18 degrees in L4 L5 according to the Dvorak's criteria, or a rotatory dislocation. Neurological compression was studied from CT scan and dynamic and static myelogram.
According to our classification results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 6 cases, fair in 9 cases and poor in 3 cases. Generally results were good on the neurological symptoms (neurological claudication, radiculalgia at rest or at exertion) and fair on the low back pain. Only one half of our patients had improvement of back pain and 15 per cent were worsened. A postoperative destabilization occurred in 27 per cent of our patients (7 levels, 7 patients). The dynamic preoperative X-rays of these destabilized levels detected always 2 or 3 criteria of instability: hypermobility, olisthesis of 2 mm or more on the flexion X-rays or rotatory subluxation. For the remaining cases only one criteria of instability was found (hypermobility or olisthesis on flexion X-rays).
Concerning the postoperative low back pain using of a flexible system associated with a neural decompression did not improve the results. Concerning the prevention of postoperative instability the Graf system did not avoid the slipping of the most instable levels.
本研究旨在确定一种与神经减压相关的柔性稳定系统在治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的有效性。特别研究了两点:随访时的腰痛以及Graf系统预防术后不稳定的能力。
对26例患者进行回顾性筛查,平均随访29个月。根据Beaujon功能评分评估临床结果。术前所有患者均进行了静态和动态标准X线检查。采用椎体后缘移位(Wiltse和Winter法)评估矢状位椎体滑脱。在动态X线片上,根据Dvorak标准,我们将椎体滑脱2mm或以上、L2-L3节段角位移等于或大于14.3度、L3-L4节段为15.5度、L4-L5节段为18度或旋转脱位视为不稳定标准。通过CT扫描以及动态和静态脊髓造影研究神经受压情况。
根据我们的分类,8例结果为优,6例为良,9例为中,3例为差。总体而言,神经症状(神经源性间歇性跛行、静息或活动时神经根痛)的结果良好,腰痛结果中等。只有一半的患者腰痛有所改善,15%的患者腰痛加重。27%的患者(7个节段,7例)出现术后失稳。这些失稳节段的术前动态X线片总是检测到2或3个不稳定标准:活动度过大、屈曲位X线片上椎体滑脱2mm或以上或旋转半脱位。其余病例仅发现1个不稳定标准(活动度过大或屈曲位X线片上椎体滑脱)。
关于术后腰痛,使用与神经减压相关的柔性系统并未改善结果。关于预防术后不稳定,Graf系统未能避免最不稳定节段的滑脱。