• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性与一般智力能力在管理者对求职者资质判断中的相对重要性。

Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications.

作者信息

Dunn W S, Mount M K, Barrick M R, Ones D S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Coe College, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 1995 Aug;80(4):500-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.500.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.500
PMID:7642460
Abstract

Eighty-four managers who make hiring decisions in 1 of 6 occupations representative of J. L. Holland's (1973) 6 job typologies (medical technologist, insurance sales agent, carpenter, licensed practical nurse, reporter, and secretary) rated 39 hypothetical job applicants on 2 dependent variables, hirability and counterproductivity. Applicants were described on the Big Five personality factors (Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) and on general mental ability. Results showed that general mental ability and conscientiousness were the most important attributes related to applicants' hirability and that Emotional Stability, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness were the most important attributes related to counterproductivity. In most respects, these results mirror meta-analytic reviews of validity studies, thereby confirming hypotheses.

摘要

84位在J. L. 霍兰德(1973)的6种工作类型(医学技术人员、保险销售代理、木匠、执业护士、记者和秘书)所代表的6种职业中做出招聘决策的经理,对39名假设的求职者在两个因变量(可聘用性和反生产力)上进行了评分。根据大五人格因素(情绪稳定性、外向性、经验开放性、宜人性和尽责性)以及一般智力对求职者进行了描述。结果表明,一般智力和尽责性是与求职者可聘用性相关的最重要属性,而情绪稳定性、尽责性和宜人性是与反生产力相关的最重要属性。在大多数方面,这些结果反映了效度研究的元分析综述,从而证实了假设。

相似文献

1
Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications.个性与一般智力能力在管理者对求职者资质判断中的相对重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 1995 Aug;80(4):500-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.500.
2
Key personality traits of sales managers.销售经理的关键个性特质。
Work. 2014;48(2):239-53. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131615.
3
Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.面部吸引力、求职者资质以及评委在预选招聘决策方面的专业知识。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.3f.1129-1134.
4
The nonlinear relationship between atypical applicant experience and hiring: The red flags perspective.非典型申请人经历与招聘之间的非线性关系:警示信号视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 May;107(5):776-794. doi: 10.1037/apl0000953. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: aggregate and individual analyses.面试官对求职者资质的预测及面试官的有效性:总体与个体分析
J Appl Psychol. 1990 Oct;75(5):477-86. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.477.
6
The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages.大五人格特质与维护和过渡工作阶段的个人工作绩效增长轨迹
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Oct;89(5):835-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835.
7
Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.印象管理和自我欺骗对人格构念预测效度的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 1996 Jun;81(3):261-72. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.261.
8
Personality traits within a pediatric surgery fellowship applicant pool.儿科手术 fellowship 申请人库中的人格特质。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community.欧洲共同体中的人格五因素模型与工作绩效
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Feb;82(1):30-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30.
10
What a difference your e-mail makes: effects of informal e-mail addresses in online résumé screening.你的邮件带来了多大的不同啊:在线简历筛选中非正式电子邮件地址的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Mar;18(3):135-40. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0542.

引用本文的文献

1
Happy-Productive worker thesis: The role of work characteristics, gender, and age.快乐高效工作者理论:工作特征、性别和年龄的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 6;20(3):e0316656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316656. eCollection 2025.
2
Quality of Life and the Digital Service Landscape: The Moderating Role of Customer Complaining Effort.生活质量与数字服务格局:客户投诉努力的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 3;13(5):375. doi: 10.3390/bs13050375.
3
Costly mistakes: Why and when spelling errors in resumes jeopardise interview chances.代价高昂的错误:为何以及何时简历中的拼写错误会危及面试机会。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283280. eCollection 2023.
4
Relation between students' personality traits and their preferred teaching methods: Students at the university of Ghana and the Huzhou Normal University.学生性格特质与其偏好的教学方法之间的关系:加纳大学和湖州师范学院的学生
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 16;9(1):e13011. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Developing a Stigma Scale for the Workplace: Focus on an Airline Cabin Crew.开发职场污名量表:以航空公司客舱机组人员为重点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 11;18(8):4003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084003.
6
Big Five Personality Traits Predict Successful Transitions From School to Vocational Education and Training: A Large-Scale Study.大五人格特质预测从学校到职业教育培训的成功过渡:一项大规模研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01827. eCollection 2020.
7
An Experiencer, An Animal or An Object? Erection Salience Decreases Men's Perceived Agency.体验者、动物还是物体?勃起凸显降低男性的主体感知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Nov;49(8):2993-3003. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01800-0. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Stronger Together: Personality, Intelligence and the Assessment of Career Potential.携手共进:个性、智力与职业潜力评估
J Intell. 2018 Nov 13;6(4):49. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040049.
9
Inflated applicants: attribution errors in performance evaluation by professionals.膨胀的申请人:专业人员在绩效评估中的归因错误。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e69258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069258. Print 2013.
10
Measures of relative importance for health-related quality of life.健康相关生活质量的相对重要性测量。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9914-7. Epub 2011 Apr 24.