• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当出现比较时。

When comparisons arise.

作者信息

Gilbert D T, Giesler R B, Morris K A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Aug;69(2):227-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.227.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.227
PMID:7643304
Abstract

People acquire information about their abilities by comparison, and research suggests that people restrict such comparisons to those whom they consider sources of diagnostic information. We suggest that diagnosticity is often considered only after comparisons are made and that people do not fail to make nondiagnostic comparisons so much as they mentally undo them. In 2 studies, participants made nondiagnostic comparisons even when they knew they should not, and quickly unmade them when they were able. These results suggest that social comparisons may be relatively spontaneous, effortless, and unintentional reactions to the performances of others and that they may occur even when people consider such reactions logically inappropriate.

摘要

人们通过比较来获取有关自身能力的信息,研究表明,人们会将这种比较限制在他们认为是诊断性信息来源的那些人身上。我们认为,人们往往是在进行比较之后才考虑诊断性,而且人们并非不进行非诊断性比较,而是在心里否定这些比较。在两项研究中,参与者即使知道不应该进行非诊断性比较,还是会进行,并且一旦有能力就会迅速否定这些比较。这些结果表明,社会比较可能是对他人表现相对自发、轻松且无意的反应,即使人们从逻辑上认为这种反应不合适,它也可能会发生。

相似文献

1
When comparisons arise.当出现比较时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Aug;69(2):227-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.227.
2
Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.情境判断测试中基于视频与纸笔评估方法:测试表现及表面效度认知的亚组差异
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Feb;82(1):143-59. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143.
3
"You can't tell just by looking!": beliefs in the diagnosticity of visual cues explain response biases in social categorization.“不能仅凭外观判断!”:对视觉线索诊断性的信念解释了社会分类中的反应偏差。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;40(11):1494-506. doi: 10.1177/0146167214549323. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
Similarity in context.上下文的相似性。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):237-55. doi: 10.3758/bf03201115.
5
Evaluating one performance among others: the influence of rank and degree of exposure to comparison referents.评估与其他表现中的一项:排名以及与比较参照对象的接触程度的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):776-92. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333044. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
6
Judgment of emotion among chronic schizophrenics.
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jul;33(3):662-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197707)33:3<662::aid-jclp2270330312>3.0.co;2-a.
7
Dissociating size representation for action and for conscious judgment: Grasping visual illusions without apparent obstacles.区分动作与意识判断中的大小表征:在无明显障碍情况下把握视觉错觉。
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Jun;15(2):269-84. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
8
Medial prefrontal dissociations during processing of trait diagnostic and nondiagnostic person information.特质诊断和非诊断人物信息处理过程中的前额叶内侧分离。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Jun;1(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl007.
9
The effect of mediation on impression formation: a comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated conditions.
Appl Ergon. 2007 May;38(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
The relationship between visual-perception and attention in Chinese with schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2005 Jan 1;72(2-3):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.02.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Me vs. the machine? Subjective evaluations of human- and AI-generated advice.我与机器?对人类和人工智能生成的建议的主观评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 1;15(1):3980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86623-6.
2
Gender differences in relations between social comparison, social support, and sleep disturbance among midlife and older adults.中年及老年成年人社会比较、社会支持与睡眠障碍之间关系的性别差异。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024 Aug 14;12(1):2390939. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2390939. eCollection 2024.
3
Upward social comparison and social anxiety among Chinese college students: a chain-mediation model of relative deprivation and rumination.
中国大学生的向上社会比较与社交焦虑:相对剥夺和反刍思维的链式中介模型
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 16;15:1430539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430539. eCollection 2024.
4
The Impact of Mobile Social Media Use on Depressive Mood Among College Students: A Chain Mediating Effect of Upward Social Comparison and Cognitive Overload.移动社交媒体使用对大学生抑郁情绪的影响:上行社会比较和认知过载的链式中介效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 May 25;17:2111-2120. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S447372. eCollection 2024.
5
The neuroscience of social comparison and competition.社会比较和竞争的神经科学。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):920-943. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01107-2. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
Retirement Planning and Financial Anxiety among Nigerian Civil Servants: Insights from Social Comparison Theory.尼日利亚公务员的退休规划与财务焦虑:来自社会比较理论的见解
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 17;13(5):425. doi: 10.3390/bs13050425.
7
Are you better than me? Social comparisons in carrion crows (Corvus corone).你比我优秀吗?腐肉鸦(Corvus corone)中的社会比较。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1353-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01785-y. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Can selfies trigger social anxiety? A study on the relationship between social media selfie behavior and social anxiety in Chinese youth group.自拍会引发社交焦虑吗?一项关于中国青年群体中社交媒体自拍行为与社交焦虑之间关系的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1016538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016538. eCollection 2022.
9
A qualitative study on negative experiences of social media use and harm reduction strategies among youths in a multi-ethnic Asian society.在一个多民族的亚洲社会中,对社交媒体使用的负面体验和减少伤害策略的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0277928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277928. eCollection 2022.
10
The pursuit of happiness: A reinforcement learning perspective on habituation and comparisons.追求幸福:习惯化和比较的强化学习视角。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 4;18(8):e1010316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010316. eCollection 2022 Aug.