Suppr超能文献

全身麻醉后临床恢复评分的评估

Evaluation of a clinical recovery score after general anesthesia.

作者信息

Quinn C L, Weaver J M, Beck M

机构信息

Section of Oral Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, School of Dentistry 90024, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 1993;40(3):67-71.

Abstract

A clinical recovery score (CRS) assessing recovery after general anesthesia was compared with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Trieger Test (TT), a patient-completed visual analogue scale for alertness (VAS), and an independent observer's evaluation of recovery. The CRS included ratings of the following parameters: activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, ambulation, color, and nausea and vomiting. Forty patients requiring the removal of three or four third molars participated in the study. All patients received the same general anesthetic technique. Each patient was evaluated by the five methods preoperatively, on admission to the recovery room, and at 15-min intervals until discharge. The four recovery tests (CRS, DSST, TT, VAS) were evaluated using chi 2 analysis to determine if there was any overall difference among the tests using the observer's determination of home readiness as the standard for discharge. The CRS was significantly more in agreement with the observer's determination than were the paper and pencil tests. The recovery tests were also evaluated with regard to instances of early dismissal or prolonged retention of the patient, again using the observer's determination as the "gold standard." The CRS was the only recovery test devoid of early dismissals. We conclude that the CRS provides a valid, simple measure of recovery that can be readily used in offices providing outpatient anesthesia and in studies measuring clinical recovery from anesthesia or sedation.

摘要

将评估全身麻醉后恢复情况的临床恢复评分(CRS)与数字符号替换测试(DSST)、特里格测试(TT)、患者完成的警觉视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及独立观察者对恢复情况的评估进行了比较。CRS包括对以下参数的评分:活动、呼吸、循环、意识、行走、肤色以及恶心和呕吐。40名需要拔除三颗或四颗第三磨牙的患者参与了该研究。所有患者均接受相同的全身麻醉技术。每位患者在术前、进入恢复室时以及直至出院前每隔15分钟通过这五种方法进行评估。使用卡方分析对四种恢复测试(CRS、DSST、TT、VAS)进行评估,以观察者确定的准备好回家作为出院标准,来判断这些测试之间是否存在总体差异。与纸笔测试相比,CRS与观察者的判断显著更一致。同样以观察者的判断作为“金标准”,对恢复测试在患者提前出院或延长留院情况方面进行了评估。CRS是唯一没有提前出院情况的恢复测试。我们得出结论,CRS提供了一种有效、简单的恢复测量方法,可在提供门诊麻醉的科室以及测量麻醉或镇静后临床恢复情况的研究中轻松使用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
THE MEASUREMENT OF RECOVERY FROM ANAESTHESIA.
Br J Anaesth. 1965 May;37:296-302. doi: 10.1093/bja/37.5.296.
2
Time course of mental and psychomotor effects of 30 per cent nitrous oxide during inhalation and recovery.
Anesthesiology. 1981 Mar;54(3):220-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198103000-00009.
5
Profile of recovery after general anaesthesia.全身麻醉后的恢复情况
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 14;286(6377):1539-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6377.1539.
6
Pencil and paper tests--sensitivity to psychotropic drugs.纸笔测试——对精神药物的敏感性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15S-20S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02578.x.
8
A postanesthetic recovery score.麻醉后恢复评分。
Anesth Analg. 1970 Nov-Dec;49(6):924-34.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验