Suppr超能文献

新西兰皇家空军恒穿式潜水服的生理评估:实验室和现场试验

Physiological assessment of the RNZAF constant wear immersion suit: laboratory and field trials.

作者信息

Cotter J D, Taylor N A

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Jun;66(6):528-36.

PMID:7646402
Abstract

Laboratory and field immersion trials were undertaken to determine the thermal protection afforded by a constant wear immersion suit (CWIS) in operation with the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF). Six males wore each of two ensembles during head-out laboratory immersions in 5.0 +/- 0.1 degree C (mean +/- SD) water for a maximum of 3 h. Ensembles 1 and 2 consisted of the CWIS in addition to minimal and maximal likely undergarment insulations, respectively. Open sea field trials (water temperature = 13.8 +/- 0.7 degree C; Beaufort wind state = 0-4; Sea state = 0-2) were conducted for a maximum of 2 h, with subjects wearing ensemble two and remaining strike aircrew apparel (ensemble three). Analysis of rectal temperature (Tre) changes permitted calculation of time to hypothermia (t35) and the survival estimate of 34 degrees C (t34). Mean (+/- SEM) t35 was 78 +/- 11 (n = 6), 187 +/- 20 (n = 5, p < 0.05) and 98 +/- 5 min (n = 3) for ensembles one, two and three, respectively. Mean t34 was 96 +/- 15, 259 +/- 31 (p < 0.05), and 119 +/- 5 min, respectively. Immersed insulations of ensembles one and two were 0.035 +/- 0.002 and 0.150 +/- 0.015 degree C.m2.W-1, respectively. Thus, the difference between minimal and maximal operational insulation was a 4.3-fold increase in insulation, which facilitated a 2.7-fold increase in mean t34. The thermal protection afforded by the CWIS during field trials was not sufficient to ensure survival for the 12-h expected rescue time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

进行了实验室和野外浸泡试验,以确定恒穿式浸泡服(CWIS)在与新西兰皇家空军(RNZAF)一起执行任务时提供的热保护。六名男性在5.0±0.1摄氏度(平均±标准差)的水中进行头部露出式实验室浸泡,每次浸泡两套服装,最长浸泡3小时。套装1和套装2分别除了可能的最小和最大内衣隔热层外,还包括恒穿式浸泡服。进行了公海野外试验(水温=13.8±0.7摄氏度;蒲福风级=0 - 4;海况=0 - 2),最长持续2小时,受试者穿着套装2和其余的突击空勤人员服装(套装3)。通过分析直肠温度(Tre)变化,可以计算出体温过低的时间(t35)和34摄氏度的生存估计时间(t34)。套装1、2和3的平均(±标准误)t35分别为78±11(n = 6)、187±20(n = 5,p < 0.05)和98±5分钟(n = 3)。平均t34分别为96±15、259±31(p < 0.05)和119±5分钟。套装1和套装2的浸泡隔热值分别为0.035±0.002和0.150±0.015摄氏度·平方米·瓦-1。因此,最小和最大操作隔热之间的差异是隔热增加了4.3倍,这使得平均t34增加了2.7倍。在野外试验期间,恒穿式浸泡服提供的热保护不足以确保在预期的12小时救援时间内生存。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验