Hoen B, Viel J F, Paquot C, Gérard A, Canton P
Département de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Apr;14(4):267-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02116518.
A previously reported statistical model based on a combination of four parameters (total polymorphonuclear cell count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), CSF/blood glucose ratio, age and month of onset) appeared effective in differentiating acute viral meningitis (AVM) from acute bacterial meningitis (ABM). The objectives of this study were to validate this model on a large independent sample of patients with acute meningitis and to build and validate a new model based on this sample. Of 500 consecutive cases of community-acquired meningitis reviewed retrospectively, 115 were ABM, 283 were AVM and 102 were of uncertain etiology. For each of the ABM and AVM cases, the probability of ABM versus AVM (pABM) was calculated for both models. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values as well as areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for both models. The original model proved an accurate and reliable diagnostic test. Its area under the ROC curve was 0.981. For pABM = 0.1, its negative and positive predictive values were 0.99 and 0.68, respectively. The new model retained four slightly different independent variables: CSF protein level, total CSF polymorphonuclear cell count, blood glucose level and leukocyte count. Its area under the ROC curve was 0.991 and, for pABM = 0.1, its negative and positive predictive values were 0.99 and 0.85, respectively. In conclusion, both models provide a valuable aid in differentiating AVM from ABM. They should be further evaluated in a prospective appraisal of their contribution to therapeutic decision making.
一种先前报道的基于四个参数(脑脊液(CSF)中多形核细胞总数、CSF/血糖比值、年龄和发病月份)组合的统计模型,似乎在区分急性病毒性脑膜炎(AVM)和急性细菌性脑膜炎(ABM)方面有效。本研究的目的是在一个大型独立的急性脑膜炎患者样本上验证该模型,并基于此样本构建和验证一个新模型。在回顾性分析的500例连续社区获得性脑膜炎病例中,115例为ABM,283例为AVM,102例病因不明。对于每例ABM和AVM病例,计算了两个模型中ABM与AVM的概率(pABM)。计算了两个模型的敏感性、特异性、预测值以及受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积。原始模型证明是一种准确可靠的诊断测试。其ROC曲线下的面积为0.981。对于pABM = 0.1,其阴性和阳性预测值分别为0.99和0.68。新模型保留了四个略有不同的自变量:CSF蛋白水平、CSF多形核细胞总数、血糖水平和白细胞计数。其ROC曲线下的面积为0.99..1,对于pABM = 0.1,其阴性和阳性预测值分别为0.99和0.85。总之,两个模型在区分AVM和ABM方面都提供了有价值的帮助。它们在对治疗决策的贡献的前瞻性评估中应进一步评估。