Suppr超能文献

通过自动脉搏波速度测量评估动脉扩张性。验证与临床应用研究。

Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement. Validation and clinical application studies.

作者信息

Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, Laurent P, Pannier B, Brisac A M, Target R, Levy B I

机构信息

Hôpital Broussais, Med I, INSERM U337, Paris, France.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1995 Sep;26(3):485-90. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.3.485.

Abstract

Pulse wave velocity is widely used as an index of arterial distensibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new automatic device to measure it and then to analyze the major determinants of pulse wave velocity by application of this device in a large population. We evaluated the accuracy of on-line and computerized measurement of pulse wave velocity using an algorithm based on the time-shifted and repeated linear correlation calculation between the initial rise in pressure waveforms compared with the reference method (manual calculation) in 56 subjects. The results, analyzed according to the recommendations of Bland and Altman, showed a mean difference of -0.20 +/- 0.45 m/s for the mean carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity values (reference method, 11.05 +/- 2.58 m/s; automatic device, 10.85 +/- 2.44 m/s). The interreproducibility and intrareproducibility of measurements by each method were analyzed with the use of the repeatability coefficient according to the British Standards Institution. The interobserver repeatability coefficient was 0.947 for the manual method and 0.890 for the automatic, and intraobserver repeatability coefficients were 0.938 and 0.935, respectively. We evaluated the major determinants of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measured by the automatic method in a separate study performed in 418 subjects of both sexes without any cardiovascular treatment or complication (18 to 77 years of age; 98 to 222 mm Hg systolic and 62 to 130 mm Hg diastolic pressure).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

脉搏波速度被广泛用作动脉可扩张性的指标。本研究的目的是评估一种新型自动测量装置的准确性,然后通过在大量人群中应用该装置来分析脉搏波速度的主要决定因素。我们在56名受试者中,使用一种基于压力波形初始上升之间的时间偏移和重复线性相关计算的算法,评估了脉搏波速度在线和计算机化测量的准确性,并与参考方法(手动计算)进行比较。根据布兰德和奥特曼的建议进行分析,结果显示,平均颈股脉搏波速度值的平均差异为-0.20±0.45米/秒(参考方法为11.05±2.58米/秒;自动装置为10.85±2.44米/秒)。根据英国标准协会的方法,使用重复性系数分析了每种方法测量的可重复性和内部可重复性。手动方法的观察者间重复性系数为0.947,自动方法为0.890,观察者内重复性系数分别为0.938和0.935。在另一项针对418名未接受任何心血管治疗或并发症的男女受试者(年龄18至77岁;收缩压98至222毫米汞柱,舒张压62至130毫米汞柱)的单独研究中,我们评估了自动测量方法测得的颈股脉搏波速度的主要决定因素。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验