Smith G D, Shipley M J, Rose G
Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Dec;44(4):265-70. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.4.265.
The aim was to explore the magnitude and causes of the differences in mortality rates according to socioeconomic position in a cohort of civil servants.
This was a prospective observational study of civil servants followed up for 10 years after baseline data collection.
Civil service offices in London.
11,678 male civil servants were studied, aged 40-64 at baseline screening between 1967 and 1969. Two indices of socioeconomic position were available on these participants--employment grade (categorised into four levels), and ownership of a car.
Main outcome measures were all cause and cause specific mortality, with cause of death taken from death certificates coded according to the eighth revision of the ICD. Employment grade and car ownership were independently related to total mortality and to mortality from the major cause groups. Combining the indices further improved definition of mortality risk and the age adjusted relative rate between the highest grade car owners and the lowest grade non-owners of 4.3 is considerably larger than the social class differentials seen in the British population. Factors potentially involved in the production of these mortality differentials were examined. Smoking, plasma cholesterol concentration, blood pressure, and glucose intolerance did not appear to account for them. The pattern of differentials was the same in the group who reported no ill health at baseline as it was in the whole sample, which suggests that health selection associated with frank illness was not a major determinant. The contribution of height, a marker for environmental factors acting in early life, was also investigated. Whereas adjustment for employment grade and car ownership attenuated the association between short stature and mortality, height differences within employment grade and car ownership groups explained little of the differential mortality.
The use of social class as an index of socioeconomic position leads to underestimation of the association between social factors and mortality, which may be reflected in public health initiatives and priorities. Known risk factors could not be shown to account for the differentials in mortality, although the degree to which this can be explored with single measurements is limited.
旨在探讨一组公务员中,根据社会经济地位划分的死亡率差异的程度及原因。
这是一项对公务员进行的前瞻性观察性研究,在收集基线数据后随访10年。
伦敦的公务员办公室。
对11678名男性公务员进行了研究,他们在1967年至1969年的基线筛查时年龄为40 - 64岁。这些参与者有两个社会经济地位指标——就业等级(分为四个级别)和汽车拥有情况。
主要结局指标为全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率,死亡原因取自根据国际疾病分类第八版编码的死亡证明。就业等级和汽车拥有情况与总死亡率以及主要病因组的死亡率独立相关。综合这些指标进一步改善了对死亡风险的定义,最高等级汽车拥有者与最低等级非汽车拥有者之间经年龄调整后的相对比率为4.3,这大大高于英国人群中观察到的社会阶层差异。研究了可能导致这些死亡率差异的因素。吸烟、血浆胆固醇浓度、血压和葡萄糖耐量异常似乎无法解释这些差异。在基线时报告无健康问题的人群中,差异模式与整个样本相同,这表明与明显疾病相关的健康选择不是主要决定因素。还研究了身高这一早期生活中环境因素的标志所起的作用。虽然对就业等级和汽车拥有情况进行调整减弱了身材矮小与死亡率之间的关联,但就业等级和汽车拥有情况组内的身高差异对死亡率差异的解释很少。
将社会阶层用作社会经济地位指标会导致低估社会因素与死亡率之间的关联,这可能反映在公共卫生举措和优先事项中。尽管单次测量对此进行探究的程度有限,但已知的风险因素无法解释死亡率差异。