Whitcomb M E, Miller R S
Division of Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, USA.
JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):696-9.
To determine the impact of limiting international medical graduate (IMG) participation in US graduate medical education (GME) on the delivery of hospital care to the poor.
To ascertain the pattern of IMG participation in GME and the degree to which the principal teaching hospitals with programs with large IMG enrollments provide care to the poor, we used data from the American Medical Association 1993 Annual Survey of Graduate Medical Education Programs and Teaching Institutions to analyze the pattern of IMG participation in GME in the six core specialties of internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, pediatrics, and psychiatry.
Programs were identified as IMG dependent if at least 50% of the resident physicians enrolled in the first year of the program were IMGs. All programs were linked to their principal teaching hospitals, and hospitals were assessed according to the number of programs based at each institution, the number of IMG-dependent programs at the institution, and whether no-pay patients and/or Medicaid/public assistance beneficiaries constituted more than 20% of the patients served.
Of the 20,170 first-year resident physicians in the six core specialties, 31.8% were IMGs. The proportion of programs dependent on IMG enrollment was 27.7%, ranging from 5.2% in obstetrics and gynecology programs to 49.5% in psychiatry programs. About 72% of all first-year IMGs were in IMG-dependent programs. Of the 688 hospitals serving as principal teaching sites for programs in at least one of the six core specialties, 106 were categorized as dependent on IMG programs, but only 77 of those provided a disproportionate amount of care to the poor. Finally, 40% of the IMG-dependent GME programs and 36% of first-year IMG residents were based in hospitals that did not provide a disproportionate amount of care to the poor.
Based on this analysis, 77 hospitals can arguably be considered dependent on IMG resident physicians to provide care to the poor. Moreover, a large number of IMG residents and IMG-dependent programs are in hospitals that do not provide a disproportionate amount of care to the poor. These findings show the scale of the problem policymakers must address if they choose to limit IMG access to GME while maintaining access of the poor to needed hospital care.
确定限制国际医学毕业生(IMG)参与美国毕业后医学教育(GME)对为贫困人口提供医院护理的影响。
为了确定IMG参与GME的模式以及招收大量IMG的主要教学医院为贫困人口提供护理的程度,我们使用了美国医学协会1993年毕业后医学教育项目和教学机构年度调查的数据,来分析IMG在六个核心专业(内科、家庭医学、妇产科、外科、儿科和精神病学)中参与GME的模式。
如果某项目第一年招收的住院医师中至少50%是IMG,则该项目被认定为依赖IMG。所有项目都与其主要教学医院相关联,并根据各机构的项目数量、该机构中依赖IMG的项目数量,以及无付费患者和/或医疗补助/公共援助受益患者是否占所服务患者的20%以上,对医院进行评估。
在六个核心专业的20170名第一年住院医师中,31.8%是IMG。依赖IMG招生的项目比例为27.7%,从妇产科项目的5.2%到精神病学项目的49.5%不等。所有第一年的IMG中约72%在依赖IMG的项目中。在为六个核心专业中至少一个专业的项目担任主要教学地点的688家医院中,106家被归类为依赖IMG项目,但其中只有77家为贫困人口提供了不成比例的护理。最后,40%依赖IMG的GME项目和36%的第一年IMG住院医师所在的医院,并未为贫困人口提供不成比例的护理。
基于这一分析,77家医院可以说是依赖IMG住院医师为贫困人口提供护理。此外,大量的IMG住院医师和依赖IMG的项目所在的医院,并未为贫困人口提供不成比例的护理。这些发现表明,如果政策制定者选择限制IMG进入GME,同时又要维持贫困人口获得所需医院护理的机会,那么他们必须解决的问题规模有多大。