Belfiore P J, Toro-Zambrana W
Department of Educational Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):205-20. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00009-c.
Principles of motion economy were assessed with two vocational tasks for two adults with severe to profound mental retardation. Study 1 assessed task acquisition by comparing two tasks (collating three pages, bagging three ribbons), one task trained using the standard job site task analysis, the other trained using a motion economy-based task analysis (requiring less total distance movement to task completion) in two alternating treatments designs. Study 2 assessed task fluency by examining the effects of the motion economy-based task analysis on collating and bagging separately across the same two adults in four reversal designs. Neither task analysis was superior overall in acquisition (Study 1), but once each task was mastered, the motion economy-based task analysis enhanced fluency across both tasks for both participants (Study 2). The use of distance movement as a parameter of response efficiency is discussed when targeting job performance, productivity, and preference.
针对两名重度至极重度智力障碍的成年人,通过两项职业任务对动作经济性原则进行了评估。研究1通过比较两项任务(整理三页纸张、包装三条丝带)来评估任务习得情况,在两种交替治疗设计中,一项任务采用标准工作现场任务分析进行训练,另一项任务采用基于动作经济性的任务分析进行训练(完成任务所需的总移动距离较短)。研究2通过在四个反转设计中分别考察基于动作经济性的任务分析对这两名成年人整理和包装任务的影响,来评估任务流畅性。在习得方面,两种任务分析总体上都不具有优势(研究1),但一旦每项任务被掌握,基于动作经济性的任务分析提高了两名参与者在两项任务上的流畅性(研究2)。在针对工作绩效、生产力和偏好时,讨论了将移动距离用作反应效率参数的情况。