• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[A national registry for cholecystectomy. Quality assurance with practical consequences?].

作者信息

Buanes T, Mjåland O, Waage A, Solheim K, Faerden A E

机构信息

Gastroenterologisk avdeling, Kirurgisk klinikk, Ullevål sykehus, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Aug 10;115(18):2236-9.

PMID:7652718
Abstract

Altogether 2,120 patients have been enrolled in the Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry during the first 18 months after it was established. 1,699 patients (80%) were operated on laparoscopically. In 174 (10.2%) the operation was changed to an open procedure. 421 (20%) were operated on primarily using an open technique. The main quality problems were mortality (1.2%) and injuries of the common bile duct (0.95%) associated with open cholecystectomy. These frequencies are far above the values stated in available literature, and two interpretations are possible: Only the best results tend to be published internationally, and our results may be representative for the national average frequencies of serious complications in other countries too. On the other hand, the present results may disclose inadequate quality insufficiency and a need for improvement. The possible actions seem to be: Firstly, to try harder to avoid open cholecystectomy in seriously ill patients (ASA 3-4). If possible, they should not be operated on at all. When surgery is essential, a laparoscopic technique seems to cause less cardiopulmonary complications. Secondly, an improved dissection technique in open (and laparoscopic) surgery is necessary in order to reduce the frequency of injuries of the common bile duct.

摘要

相似文献

1
[A national registry for cholecystectomy. Quality assurance with practical consequences?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Aug 10;115(18):2236-9.
2
Bile leak after cholecystectomy significance and treatment: results from the National Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry.胆囊切除术后胆漏的意义及治疗:来自挪威国家胆囊切除术登记处的结果
Int Surg. 1996 Jul-Sep;81(3):276-9.
3
[The Danish Cholecystectomy Database--DCD].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Jun 13;167(24):2618-20.
4
[Complications of cholecystectomy before and after introduction of laparoscopic surgery].[腹腔镜手术引入前后胆囊切除术的并发症]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Feb 5;163(6):763-5.
5
Progress with cholecystectomy: improving results in England and Wales.胆囊切除术的进展:改善英格兰和威尔士的手术效果
Br J Surg. 1997 Oct;84(10):1396-8.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.英格兰和威尔士的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:英国皇家外科医学院的一项审计结果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):269-75.
7
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆管损伤:一项全国性前瞻性研究系列
J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jun;184(6):571-8.
8
Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Int Surg. 1995 Oct-Dec;80(4):361-4.
9
Complications during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Norway. A prospective multicentre study in seven hospitals.挪威腹腔镜胆囊切除术开展过程中的并发症。一项在七家医院进行的前瞻性多中心研究。
Eur J Surg. 1994 Mar;160(3):145-51.
10
[External comparative quality assurance in cholecystectomy. Results of the Federal evaluation, 2001].[胆囊切除术的外部比较质量保证。2001年联邦评估结果]
Chirurg. 2003 Mar;74(3):M68-73.