Dunn D, Nair R, Fowler S, McCloy R
Comparative Audit Service, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):269-75.
The results of an audit of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy conducted by the Comparative Audit Service of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are presented. Data were submitted by 124 consultant surgeons on 3319 attempted laparoscopic and by 227 consultant surgeons on 8035 open cholecystectomies performed in England and Wales during the 2 years 1990 and 1991. These were contrasted with 9322 attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomies reported in 21 series reported in the world literature between 1991 and 1992, and with five other nations' audit studies. Among attempted laparoscopic cases, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 175/3319 (5.2%) of cases and overall mortality was 0.15% (5/3319). Major complications were reported in 2.1% and minor complications in 5.9% of cases. Bile duct injury was reported to be significantly more common after attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (11/3319, 0.33%) than after open cholecystectomy (4/8035, 0.06%) (95% confidence intervals -0.48 to 0.08), but it was not significantly different from that reported for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the combined world literature (28/9322, 0.3%) (95% confidence intervals -0.19 to 0.25). Most systemic complications were significantly more common after open cholecystectomy. For open cholecystectomy, the mortality was 55/8035 (0.76%), with major complications reported in 3.2% and minor complications in 9.8% of patients. Adoption of the laparoscopic approach was associated with a four-fifths reduction in the mortality of cholecystectomy, and a 40% reduction in the overall complication rate when compared with the open operation. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy has an impressively low mortality and morbidity profile during the first 2 years of its introduction into the UK, prevention of bile duct injury is the most important issue to be addressed in all laparoscopic cholecystectomy training programmes.
本文呈现了由英国皇家外科医学院比较审计服务部开展的一项关于开腹胆囊切除术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的审计结果。1990年和1991年这两年间,124位顾问外科医生提交了3319例腹腔镜胆囊切除术的相关数据,227位顾问外科医生提交了在英格兰和威尔士实施的8035例开腹胆囊切除术的数据。将这些数据与1991年至1992年间世界文献报道的21个系列中的9322例腹腔镜胆囊切除术尝试病例,以及其他五个国家的审计研究进行了对比。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术尝试病例中,175/3319(5.2%)的病例需要转为开腹手术,总体死亡率为0.15%(5/3319)。2.1%的病例报告有严重并发症,5.9%的病例有轻微并发症。据报告,腹腔镜胆囊切除术尝试后胆管损伤明显比开腹胆囊切除术后更常见(11/3319,0.33%对比4/8035,0.06%)(95%置信区间为 -0.48至0.08),但与世界文献综合报道的腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤发生率(28/9322,0.3%)无显著差异(95%置信区间为 -0.19至0.25)。大多数全身并发症在开腹胆囊切除术后明显更常见。对于开腹胆囊切除术,死亡率为55/8035(0.76%),3.2%的患者报告有严重并发症,9.8%的患者有轻微并发症。与开腹手术相比,采用腹腔镜手术方法使胆囊切除术死亡率降低五分之四,总体并发症发生率降低40%。虽然腹腔镜胆囊切除术在引入英国的头两年死亡率和发病率极低,但预防胆管损伤是所有腹腔镜胆囊切除术培训项目中要解决的最重要问题。