Ward M P, Gardner I A, Flanagan M
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Toowoomba, Australia.
Vet Microbiol. 1995 Jun;45(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)00119-h.
An agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test to detect group-specific antibodies to infection of cattle by bluetongue viruses was evaluated using field collected sera in Queensland, Australia. The AGID test was compared to the serum neutralisation (SN) test used to detect serotype-specific bluetongue virus antibodies. The AGID test was found to be highly sensitive (95% confidence interval, 80.7-100%) but to have moderate specificity (95% confidence interval, 59.3-79.6%), relative to the SN test. The correlation between AGID and SN test results was 0.41 (P < 0.001). Using likelihood ratio estimates the chance (posttest probability) of an AGID test positive serum sample being positive (titre > or = 1:20) in the SN test was estimated to be 87% and 90% for 2+ and 3+ AGID test reactions, respectively. A serum sample was estimated to have a probability of 40% of being positive in the SN test if it gave a 1+ reaction in the AGID test. Results suggest that the AGID test should ideally be used as a screening test in serological surveys and surveillance programs. If the test is to be used for identification of individually infected cattle, a cutoff point of > or = 2+ should be employed.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州,利用现场采集的血清对一种用于检测牛感染蓝舌病病毒后群体特异性抗体的琼脂凝胶免疫扩散(AGID)试验进行了评估。将AGID试验与用于检测血清型特异性蓝舌病病毒抗体的血清中和(SN)试验进行了比较。相对于SN试验,发现AGID试验具有高度敏感性(95%置信区间,80.7 - 100%),但特异性中等(95%置信区间,59.3 - 79.6%)。AGID试验与SN试验结果之间的相关性为0.41(P < 0.001)。使用似然比估计,AGID试验阳性血清样本在SN试验中呈阳性(滴度>或 = 1:20)的概率(检测后概率),对于2 +和3 +的AGID试验反应分别估计为87%和90%。如果一个血清样本在AGID试验中呈1 +反应,估计其在SN试验中呈阳性的概率为40%。结果表明,AGID试验理想情况下应在血清学调查和监测项目中用作筛查试验。如果该试验用于识别个体感染的牛,应采用>或 = 2 +的截断点。