Middlekauff H R, Stevenson W G, Saxon L A, Stevenson L W
Division of Cardiology, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine 90024, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Sep 1;76(7):499-502. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80138-6.
Amiodarone is considered to be safe in patients with prior QT prolongation and torsades de pointes taking class I antiarrhythmic agents who require continued antiarrhythmic drug therapy. However, the safety of amiodarone in advanced heart failure patients with a history of drug-induced torsades de pointes, who may be more susceptible to proarrhythmia, is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess amiodarone safety and efficacy in heart failure patients with prior antiarrhythmic drug-induced torsades de pointes. We determined the history of torsades de pointes in 205 patients with heart failure treated with amiodarone, and compared the risk of sudden death in patients with and without such a history. To evaluate the possibility that all patients with a history of torsades de pointes would be at high risk for sudden death regardless of amiodarone treatment, we compared this risk in patients with a history of torsades de pointes who were and were not subsequently treated with amiodarone. Of 205 patients with advanced heart failure, 8 (4%) treated with amiodarone had prior drug-induced torsades de pointes. Despite similar severity of heart failure, the 1-year actuarial sudden death risk was markedly increased in amiodarone patients with than without prior torsades de pointes (55% vs 15%, p = 0.0001). Similarly, the incidence of 1-year sudden death was markedly increased in patients with prior torsades de pointes taking amiodarone compared with such patients who were not subsequently treated with amiodarone (55% vs 0%, p = 0.09).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对于先前有QT间期延长和尖端扭转型室速且正在服用I类抗心律失常药物而需要继续进行抗心律失常药物治疗的患者,胺碘酮被认为是安全的。然而,胺碘酮在有药物性尖端扭转型室速病史的晚期心力衰竭患者中的安全性尚不清楚,这类患者可能更容易发生心律失常。因此,本研究的目的是评估胺碘酮在有抗心律失常药物所致尖端扭转型室速病史的心力衰竭患者中的安全性和有效性。我们确定了205例接受胺碘酮治疗的心力衰竭患者的尖端扭转型室速病史,并比较了有和无此类病史患者的猝死风险。为了评估所有有尖端扭转型室速病史的患者无论是否接受胺碘酮治疗都有高猝死风险的可能性,我们比较了有尖端扭转型室速病史且随后接受和未接受胺碘酮治疗患者的这种风险。在205例晚期心力衰竭患者中,8例(4%)接受胺碘酮治疗的患者有先前药物性尖端扭转型室速病史。尽管心力衰竭严重程度相似,但有尖端扭转型室速病史的胺碘酮治疗患者1年实际猝死风险显著高于无此病史者(55%对15%,p = 0.0001)。同样,有尖端扭转型室速病史且接受胺碘酮治疗的患者1年猝死发生率显著高于随后未接受胺碘酮治疗的此类患者(55%对0%,p = 0.09)。(摘要截短于250字)