Caddell D P, Newton R R
Department of Sociology, Seattle Pacific University, WA 98119, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Jun;40(12):1671-81. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00287-4.
This is a study of American public opinion toward euthanasia and the physician's role in performing it. The authors examine how these attributes are affected by religious affiliation, religious self-perception, political self-perception and education. The data include 8384 American respondents from years 1977, 1978, 1982, 1985 and 1988 of the General Social Survey conducted by the National Opinion Research Center. The findings suggest that highly educated, politically liberal respondents with a less religious self-perception are most likely to accept active euthanasia or suicide in the case of terminally ill patient. The data also show that Americans tend to draw a distinction between the suicide of a terminally ill patient and active euthanasia under the care of a physician, preferring to have the physician perform this role in the dying process. The tendency to see a distinction between active euthanasia and suicide was clearly affected by religious affiliation and education.
这是一项关于美国公众对安乐死以及医生在实施安乐死中所扮演角色的看法的研究。作者们考察了宗教归属、宗教自我认知、政治自我认知和教育程度是如何影响这些属性的。数据包括来自全国民意研究中心在1977年、1978年、1982年、1985年和1988年进行的综合社会调查中的8384名美国受访者。研究结果表明,受过高等教育、政治上倾向自由主义且宗教自我认知较低的受访者最有可能接受对绝症患者实施主动安乐死或协助自杀。数据还显示,美国人倾向于区分绝症患者的自杀和在医生照料下的主动安乐死,更倾向于让医生在临终过程中扮演这一角色。对主动安乐死和自杀进行区分的倾向明显受到宗教归属和教育程度的影响。