Nicholas W C, Fischer R G, Stevenson R A, Bass J D
Department of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.
South Med J. 1995 Sep;88(9):973-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199509000-00018.
This study to compare single-dose and multiple-dose antithyroid therapy was prompted by a perceived lack of compliance in our University Medical Clinics by those patients using multidose regimens. Twenty-two hyperthyroid patients were randomly assigned to two therapy groups. Twelve received methimazole (Tapazole) 30 mg once daily in the morning; 10 received propylthiouracil 100 mg every 8 hours. Patients were seen every 4 weeks for 3 months and assessed clinically, as well as having the appropriate thyroid tests done. Univariate analysis revealed no difference in the two groups at baseline. Posttreatment assessment revealed the once-a-day methimazole therapy to be just as effective as propylthiouracil in improving thyroid indices and clinical markers. Compliance with methimazole was 83.3% compared to 53.3% with propylthiouracil. In conclusion, once-a-day methimazole was just as effective as propylthiouracil every 8 hours in this population. Compliance was also improved with the once-a-day therapy.
由于我们大学医学诊所中使用多剂量方案的患者存在明显的依从性不足,因此开展了这项比较单剂量和多剂量抗甲状腺治疗的研究。22名甲状腺功能亢进患者被随机分为两个治疗组。12名患者每天早晨服用一次30毫克甲巯咪唑(他巴唑);10名患者每8小时服用100毫克丙硫氧嘧啶。患者每4周就诊一次,持续3个月,进行临床评估,并进行适当的甲状腺检查。单因素分析显示两组在基线时无差异。治疗后评估显示,每日一次的甲巯咪唑治疗在改善甲状腺指标和临床标志物方面与丙硫氧嘧啶同样有效。甲巯咪唑的依从率为83.3%,而丙硫氧嘧啶为53.3%。总之,在该人群中,每日一次的甲巯咪唑与每8小时一次的丙硫氧嘧啶效果相同。每日一次的治疗也提高了依从性。