Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Sep;62(3):655S-708S; discussion 518-26. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/62.3.655S.
This review critically evaluates the scientific data on trans fatty acids and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Trans fatty acids are present in a variety of foods but they contribute only 4-12% of total dietary fat intake (2-4% of total energy intake) in the United States. The physical properties of trans fatty acids are intermediate between cis and saturated fatty acids, but a trans double bond is chemically less reactive than a cis double bond. Biochemical data indicate that trans fatty acids are subject to the same metabolic control mechanisms that regulate the metabolism of saturated and cis-isomeric fatty acids. Equivocal results have been reported in observational studies of trans fatty acid intake and CHD because of numerous methodologic limitations, including the difficulties inherent in quantifying trans fatty acid intake. Studies in hamsters indicate that trans fatty acids have a neutral effect on low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor activity, LDL-cholesterol production rate, and plasma LDL-cholesterol concentration. Other animal studies show no differences in atherosclerosis incidence or severity between diets containing hydrogenated and native vegetable oils. In clinical studies partially hydrogenated oils lower total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations when substituted for animal or vegetable fats rich in saturates but raise total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations when substituted for the unhydrogenated native oil. The effects of trans fatty acids on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) concentrations are unclear because of limited and conflicting clinical data. Data supporting a relation between trans fatty acid intake and CHD risk are equivocal compared with extensive data from studies in animals and humans linking saturated fat intake to CHD. Additional research is needed to resolve questions about the independent effects of trans fatty acids on plasma lipoproteins and their mechanisms of action.
本综述批判性地评估了关于反式脂肪酸与冠心病(CHD)风险的科学数据。反式脂肪酸存在于多种食物中,但在美国,它们仅占膳食脂肪总摄入量的4 - 12%(占总能量摄入的2 - 4%)。反式脂肪酸的物理性质介于顺式脂肪酸和饱和脂肪酸之间,但反式双键的化学反应性比顺式双键低。生化数据表明,反式脂肪酸受到与调节饱和脂肪酸和顺式异构体脂肪酸代谢相同的代谢控制机制的影响。由于存在众多方法学上的局限性,包括量化反式脂肪酸摄入量所固有的困难,在关于反式脂肪酸摄入量与冠心病的观察性研究中报告的结果并不明确。对仓鼠的研究表明,反式脂肪酸对低密度脂蛋白(LDL)受体活性、LDL胆固醇生成率和血浆LDL胆固醇浓度具有中性作用。其他动物研究表明,含有氢化植物油和天然植物油的饮食在动脉粥样硬化发病率或严重程度上没有差异。在临床研究中,部分氢化油替代富含饱和脂肪酸的动物脂肪或植物脂肪时会降低总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇浓度,但替代未氢化的天然油时会升高总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇浓度。由于临床数据有限且相互矛盾,反式脂肪酸对高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和脂蛋白(a)浓度的影响尚不清楚。与将饱和脂肪摄入量与冠心病联系起来的大量动物和人体研究数据相比,支持反式脂肪酸摄入量与冠心病风险之间关系的数据并不明确。需要进行更多研究来解决关于反式脂肪酸对血浆脂蛋白的独立影响及其作用机制的问题。