The need for ventilatory support during bystander CPR.

作者信息

Berg R A, Wilcoxson D, Hilwig R W, Kern K B, Sanders A B, Otto C W, Eklund D K, Ewy G A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, College of Agriculture, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;26(3):342-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70084-6.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare CPR with chest compressions plus ventilatory support (CC+V) and chest compressions alone (CC).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

INTERVENTIONS

After 2 minutes of ventricular fibrillation, 18 domestic swine (20 to 35 kg) were treated first with CC or CC+V for 10 minutes, then with standard advanced cardiac life support.

RESULTS

Hemodynamics, survival, and neurologic outcome were determined. All 8 swine subjected to CC+V and all 10 subjected to CC showed return of spontaneous circulation. One animal in each group died within 1 hour. Seven of 8 animals in the CC+V group survived for 24 and 48 hours, compared with 9 of 10 CC animals at 24 hours and 8 of 10 at 48 hours. All 48-hour survivors were neurologically normal.

CONCLUSION

In this experimental model of bystander CPR, we could not detect a difference in hemodynamics, 48-hour survival, or neurologic outcome when CPR was applied with and without ventilatory support.