Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性黄斑水肿的局灶性光凝治疗。治疗效果与基线时荧光素血管造影及其他视网膜特征的关系:早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究报告第19号。早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究研究组

Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema. Relationship of treatment effect to fluorescein angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline: ETDRS report no. 19. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Sep;113(9):1144-55.

PMID:7661748
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the efficacy of photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema may be influenced by degree of capillary closure, severity or source of fluorescein leakage, extent of retinal edema, presence of cystoid changes, or severity of hard exudates.

PATIENTS

Patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema definitely or questionably involving the center of the macula.

DESIGN

One eye of each patient was assigned to early photocoagulation; the other was assigned to deferral of photocoagulation, with follow-up visits scheduled every 4 months and photocoagulation to be carried out promptly if high-risk proliferative retinopathy developed. In this report, the beneficial effect of photocoagulation was examined in subgroups defined by severity of the characteristics specified above.

RESULTS

We found no subgroup in which eyes that were assigned to immediate focal treatment had a less favorable visual acuity outcome than those that were assigned to deferral (ie, no qualitative interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Focal photocoagulation should be considered for eyes with clinically significant macular edema, particularly when the center of the macula is involved or imminently threatened. Trends for treatment effect to be less in eyes with less extensive retinal thickening and less thickening at the center of the macula support our previous recommendation that, for such eyes, an initial period of close observation may be preferable to immediate treatment, particularly when most of the leakage to be treated arises close to the center of the macula, increasing the risk of damage to it from direct treatment or subsequent migration of treatment scars.

摘要

目的

确定糖尿病性黄斑水肿光凝治疗的疗效是否会受到毛细血管闭塞程度、荧光素渗漏的严重程度或来源、视网膜水肿范围、囊样改变的存在情况或硬性渗出物的严重程度的影响。

患者

患有轻度至中度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变且黄斑水肿明确或可疑累及黄斑中心的患者。

设计

每位患者的一只眼睛被指定接受早期光凝治疗;另一只眼睛被指定延迟光凝治疗,每4个月安排一次随访,如果发生高危增殖性视网膜病变则立即进行光凝治疗。在本报告中,在由上述特征的严重程度定义的亚组中检查了光凝治疗的有益效果。

结果

我们发现没有一个亚组中,接受立即局部治疗的眼睛的视力结果比接受延迟治疗的眼睛更差(即没有定性相互作用)。

结论

对于患有具有临床意义的黄斑水肿的眼睛,尤其是当黄斑中心受累或即将受到威胁时,应考虑进行局部光凝治疗。视网膜增厚范围较小且黄斑中心增厚较少的眼睛治疗效果较差的趋势支持了我们之前的建议,即对于此类眼睛,最初一段时间的密切观察可能比立即治疗更可取,特别是当大部分需要治疗的渗漏发生在黄斑中心附近时,直接治疗或治疗瘢痕随后迁移对其造成损害的风险增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验