Yoshino M, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Seta S
First Medico-Legal Section, National Research Institute of Police Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Forensic Sci Int. 1995 Jun 30;74(1-2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01742-2.
Using 52 skulls in forensic cases, the anatomical consistency of cranio-facial superimposition images was investigated for evaluating the validity in personal identification by the superimposition method. In 35 out of 52 cases the unknown skull was positively identified as the missing person by matching of the outline and anatomical relation in skull and face images taken from frontal, oblique and lateral directions. The unknown skull in two cases was exclusive of the presumed person since the outline of the skull was not anatomically consistent with that of the face. In the remaining 15 cases, the skull in question was examined using only a frontal face photograph of the missing person and matched with it because of the lack of other photographs taken from different angles, giving a probable identification. From our practical examination, it is stated that the outline from the trichion to the gnathion in the lateral or oblique view is the preferable portion for personal identification, and the cranio-facial super-imposition method is reliable for individualization when two or more facial photographs taken from different angles are used in the examination.
利用法医案件中的52个颅骨,研究了颅面叠加图像的解剖学一致性,以评估叠加法在个人识别中的有效性。在52例案件中的35例中,通过匹配从正面、斜向和侧面拍摄的颅骨和面部图像的轮廓及解剖关系,未知颅骨被明确鉴定为失踪人员。2例案件中的未知颅骨排除了推测的人员,因为颅骨轮廓与面部轮廓在解剖学上不一致。在其余15例案件中,由于缺少从不同角度拍摄的其他照片,仅使用失踪人员的正面面部照片对相关颅骨进行检查并与之匹配,得出了可能的鉴定结果。根据我们的实际检验,侧视图或斜视图中从发际到颌下点的轮廓是个人识别的优选部位,并且当在检验中使用从不同角度拍摄的两张或更多张面部照片时,颅面叠加法对于个体化识别是可靠的。