• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Determination of the susceptibility in vitro of 54 isolates of Mycobacterium fortuitum against three fluoroquinolones using two methods.

作者信息

Hernández A M, Arias A, Felipe A, Alvarez R, Sierra A

机构信息

Chair of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1995 Apr;7(2):109-13. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.2.109.

DOI:10.1179/joc.1995.7.2.109
PMID:7666115
Abstract

The in vitro susceptibility to ofloxacin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin or 54 Mycobacterium fortuitum isolates originating from clinical samples (7) of patients attending the Hospital Universitario de Canarias and Hospital del Tórax, and from environmental (47) sources, were determined. For this, two methods were used: dilution in agar with Middlebrook 7H10 Agar as a base medium culture, and broth microdilution, with Mueller-Hinton Broth without supplement. The different isolates under study revealed a uniform susceptibility by both methods against ciprofloxacin. 100% inhibition was obtained from a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of 0.25 microgram/ml, and 2 micrograms/ml of ciprofloxacin, for broth microdilution and dilution in agar, respectively. For ofloxacin and norfloxacin, all the isolates were inhibited at an MIC of 0.5 microgram/ml, by the broth microdilution method, which contrasted sharply with an MIC of 32 micrograms/ml, in the case of dilution in agar. In this study, we have observed the existence of differences in the in vitro susceptibility of the isolates of M. fortuitum against the three fluoroquinolones assayed, mainly for ofloxacin and norfloxacin, by both methods. We, therefore, consider it necessary to establish a standardized, reproducible assay method, for the study of sensitivity to atypical mycobacteria.

摘要

相似文献

1
Determination of the susceptibility in vitro of 54 isolates of Mycobacterium fortuitum against three fluoroquinolones using two methods.
J Chemother. 1995 Apr;7(2):109-13. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.2.109.
2
Determination of the in vitro susceptibility of 220 Mycobacterium fortuitum isolates to ten antimicrobial agents.220株偶然分枝杆菌分离株对十种抗菌药物的体外敏感性测定。
J Chemother. 1995 Dec;7(6):503-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.6.503.
3
[In vitro determination of the sensitivity of mycobacteria to fluoroquinolones].[分枝杆菌对氟喹诺酮类药物敏感性的体外测定]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 May;37(5):346-9.
4
[In vitro sensitivity of Mycobacterium chelonae strains to various antimicrobial agents].
Microbiologia. 1995 Dec;11(4):485-90.
5
[Determination of antimycobacterial activities of fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: comparative determination with egg-based Ogawa and agar-based Middlebrook 7H10 media].
Kekkaku. 1996 Aug;71(8):453-8.
6
In vitro susceptibility of Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium avium against some quinolones.偶然分枝杆菌、龟分枝杆菌和鸟分枝杆菌对某些喹诺酮类药物的体外敏感性。
Chemioterapia. 1987 Dec;6(6):431-3.
7
In vitro activity of four fluoroquinolones against eighty-six isolates of mycobacteria.四种氟喹诺酮类药物对86株分枝杆菌的体外活性
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Oct;6(5):584-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02014255.
8
[Comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activities of ofloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and sparfloxacin against various mycobacteria].氧氟沙星、左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星和司帕沙星对各种分枝杆菌的体外抗菌活性比较
Kekkaku. 2001 Apr;76(4):357-62.
9
In vitro antimicrobial activity of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.左氧氟沙星对肺炎链球菌的体外抗菌活性。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1997 Oct;60(4):191-4.
10
Comparative antimycobacterial activities of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and grepafloxacin.氧氟沙星、环丙沙星和格帕沙星的抗分枝杆菌活性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Nov;44(5):647-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.5.647.