Francis D D, Zaharia M D, Shanks N, Anisman H
Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Verdun, Québec, Canada.
Physiol Behav. 1995 Jul;58(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00009-8.
Marked differences were observed across strains of mice (i.e., DBA/2J, C57BL/6J, BALB/cByJ and CD-1 mice) in acquisition, performance and reversal of a place learning response in a Morris water-maze. While DBA/2J, C57BL/6J and CD-1 mice typically learned the response readily, only 20% of BALB/cByJ mice acquired the response. Commensurate with the effects of hippocampal disturbances, the performance deficits in BALB/cByJ mice were not evident when the position of the platform in the water-maze was cued. Exposure to uncontrollable foot shock did not affect the acquisition or performance of this response in the former three strains, but provoked a modest disruption of reversal performance in DBA/2J mice and markedly impaired reversal performance in BALB/cByJ mice. It seemed, however, that the response strategies adopted in these strains could be distinguished from one another. In the reversal paradigm BALB/cByJ mice initially persisted in returning to the original training quadrant rather than to the new goal quadrant. Following 2 days of training the perseveration was no longer apparent and animals seemed to adopt a random search strategy. In contrast, DBA/2J mice, which exhibited a smaller stress-induced disturbance, did not display a perseverative response style. These data suggest that inescapable shock does not disturb response-outcome associations, but may result from the induction of a perseverative response style. However, it appears that the mechanisms responsible for an interference of performance may not be uniform across strains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在莫里斯水迷宫中,观察到不同品系小鼠(即DBA/2J、C57BL/6J、BALB/cByJ和CD-1小鼠)在位置学习反应的习得、表现和反转方面存在显著差异。虽然DBA/2J、C57BL/6J和CD-1小鼠通常很容易学会这种反应,但只有20%的BALB/cByJ小鼠能够习得。与海马体紊乱的影响相一致,当水迷宫中平台的位置有线索提示时,BALB/cByJ小鼠的表现缺陷并不明显。暴露于不可控的足部电击对前三种品系小鼠的这种反应的习得或表现没有影响,但在DBA/2J小鼠中引起了适度的反转表现破坏,在BALB/cByJ小鼠中则显著损害了反转表现。然而,这些品系所采用的反应策略似乎彼此不同。在反转范式中,BALB/cByJ小鼠最初坚持回到原来的训练象限而不是新的目标象限。经过2天的训练后,这种坚持不再明显,动物似乎采用了随机搜索策略。相比之下,表现出较小应激诱导干扰的DBA/2J小鼠没有表现出坚持的反应方式。这些数据表明,不可逃避的电击不会干扰反应-结果关联,但可能是由于诱导了一种坚持的反应方式。然而,似乎导致表现受干扰的机制在不同品系中可能并不一致。(摘要截短至250字)