Laverty C R, Thurloe J K, Redman N L, Farnsworth A
Dr Colin Laverty & Associates, Eastwood, NSW, Australia.
Cytopathology. 1995 Jun;6(3):140-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1995.tb00466.x.
To evaluate the sensitivity and suitability of ThinPrep, a new slide preparation technique, 2026 paired cervical cytology slides were examined. After conventional Papanicolaou smears were prepared, the sampling instruments were rinsed in a fluid fixative. ThinPrep slides were then prepared in the laboratory from the surplus cells in the fixative. Compared with the Pap smears, ThinPrep slides were easier and quicker to screen, were inconclusive less often, and had similar rates for detecting abnormalities and infection. There were more unsatisfactory ThinPrep slides and more ThinPrep slides lacked endocervical cells. Both of these shortcomings were found to be linked to the choice of sampling implements. This study, in which a variety of sampling instruments was used, fails to confirm some of the previous claims made for the new technique.
为评估一种新的玻片制备技术——薄层液基制片术(ThinPrep)的敏感性和适用性,对2026对宫颈细胞学玻片进行了检查。制备传统巴氏涂片后,将取样器械在液体固定剂中冲洗。然后在实验室从固定剂中的剩余细胞制备薄层液基制片玻片。与巴氏涂片相比,薄层液基制片玻片更容易、更快进行筛查,诊断不明确的情况更少,并且检测异常和感染的比率相似。薄层液基制片玻片有更多不合格情况,且更多薄层液基制片玻片缺乏宫颈管细胞。发现这两个缺点均与取样工具的选择有关。本研究使用了多种取样器械,未能证实此前对这项新技术的一些说法。