Müller M R, Stangl P, Salat A, End A, Böhm D, Klepetko W, Eckersberger F, Wolner E
Klinische Abteilung für Herz-Thorax-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie Wien.
Chirurg. 1995 Jul;66(7):678-83.
With the further development of new surgical techniques, that allow for the performance of a variety of standard diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in a less invasive fashion, it is instructive to look at the complications of these new techniques, in order to define their role for general thoracic surgery. 372 patients have been treated by means of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) between 1/1992 and 12/1994. A total of 934 open thoracic procedures were performed in the same time frame, 399 out of them for the same chest disorders as treated by VATS alternatively. In 40 cases (10.7%) the endoscopic procedure had to be converted to an open thoracotomy. The main reasons for conversion were inability to locate or resect lesions due to a deep or central position (n = 13), requirement of further resection (n = 10), adhesions (n = 9), fibrinopurulent empyema (n = 5), bleeding (n = 2) and single-lung-ventilation failure (n = 1). The mean operation time was significantly shorter with VATS compared to open procedures, except for decortications. The mean hospital stay was 4.2 days in the endoscopic and 7.9 days in the thoracotomy group. Cost analysis for both techniques included expenses for disposable instruments, the operation room, anesthesia, and total hospital charges. Higher costs for instruments for VATS procedures were compensated by shorter chest drainage, less postoperative need for analgetics and a significantly shorter hospital stay.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
随着新手术技术的进一步发展,这些技术能够以微创方式进行各种标准的诊断和治疗程序,了解这些新技术的并发症对于明确其在普通胸外科手术中的作用具有指导意义。在1992年1月至1994年12月期间,共有372例患者接受了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗。在同一时间段内,共进行了934例开胸手术,其中399例与VATS治疗的胸部疾病相同。在40例(10.7%)病例中,内镜手术不得不转为开胸手术。转为开胸手术的主要原因包括由于病变位置深或位于中央而无法定位或切除(n = 13)、需要进一步切除(n = 10)、粘连(n = 9)、纤维脓性脓胸(n = 5)、出血(n = 2)和单肺通气失败(n = 1)。与开胸手术相比,除了胸膜剥脱术外,VATS的平均手术时间明显更短。内镜手术组的平均住院时间为4.2天,开胸手术组为7.9天。两种技术的成本分析包括一次性器械、手术室、麻醉和总住院费用。VATS手术器械成本较高,但因胸腔引流时间缩短、术后镇痛药需求减少和住院时间明显缩短而得到补偿。(摘要截断于250字)