Catt J, Ryan J, Pike I, O'Neill C
Human Reproduction Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Fertil Steril. 1995 Oct;64(4):764-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57852-2.
To determine a suitable method of sperm preparation for use in micromanipulation. To compare the fertilization rates of sibling oocytes inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and subzonal insemination (SUZI).
Two methods of gamete micromanipulation to overcome male factor infertility were compared. Within this study, three trials were conducted to determine the most suitable method of sperm preparation. This method then was used to complete the study.
Procedures were performed in a teaching hospital research environment.
Ninety-six patients were recruited for this study, undergoing 99 stimulation cycles.
Sibling oocytes were inseminated by subzonal sperm or intracytoplasmic injection.
Fertilization, zygote development, and pregnancy rates.
In the absence of manipulative pretreatment of sperm (trial 1), there was no difference in normal fertilization rates between ICSI and SUZI (19% and 25%, respectively). In the second trial there again was no sperm pretreatment for SUZI but, for ICSI, a polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solution was used to reduce sperm velocity and the sperm tails were incised before injection. The fertilization rates were significantly different between ICSI (44%) and SUZI (17%). In the third trial, PVP was added to the sperm used for both types of insemination and the sperm tails also were incised for the ICSI insemination. Fertilization was again significantly different (16% for SUZI and 44% for ICSI). The trial 2 method of sperm preparation then was used to complete the study (trial 4) and confirmed the results of trial 2 (21% for SUZI and 42% for ICSI). The results suggest that ICSI can give improved fertilization compared with SUZI provided the sperm are treated before injection. No significant differences were found in the development rates of zygotes suitable for transfer or cryopreservation between the two micromanipulation methods.
确定一种适用于显微操作的精子制备方法。比较经卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)和透明带下授精(SUZI)授精的同胞卵母细胞的受精率。
比较两种克服男性因素不孕症的配子显微操作方法。在本研究中,进行了三项试验以确定最合适的精子制备方法。然后使用该方法完成研究。
在一家教学医院的研究环境中进行操作。
96名患者被招募参加本研究,经历了99个刺激周期。
同胞卵母细胞通过透明带下精子授精或卵胞浆内注射授精。
受精、合子发育和妊娠率。
在未对精子进行操作预处理的情况下(试验1),ICSI和SUZI的正常受精率无差异(分别为19%和25%)。在第二项试验中,SUZI同样未对精子进行预处理,但对于ICSI,使用聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)溶液降低精子速度,并在注射前切断精子尾部。ICSI(44%)和SUZI(17%)的受精率有显著差异。在第三项试验中,两种授精方式使用的精子均添加了PVP,且ICSI授精时也切断了精子尾部。受精率再次有显著差异(SUZI为16%,ICSI为44%)。然后使用试验2的精子制备方法完成研究(试验4),并证实了试验2的结果(SUZI为21%,ICSI为42%)。结果表明,与SUZI相比,若精子在注射前经过处理,ICSI可提高受精率。两种显微操作方法在适合移植或冷冻保存的合子发育率方面未发现显著差异。