Arber N, Berliner S, Hallak A, Bujanover Y, Dotan I, Liberman E, Santo M, Moshkowitz M, Ratan J, Dotan G
Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center Ichilov Hospital, Israel.
Gut. 1995 Jul;37(1):77-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.37.1.77.
The aim of the study was to determine the comparative usefulness of inflammatory markers, in evaluating disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Disease activity was assessed by the Mayo Clinic score for ulcerative colitis, and Harvey-Bradshaw score for Crohn's disease. Five hundred normal blood donors who had no underlying inflammatory condition served as controls. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet and white blood cell count, C reactive protein, and the leucocyte adhesiveness/aggregation test (LAAT) were determined in each patient. One hundred and twenty four patients with inflammatory bowel disease were tested while in remission and 128 in relapse. Their mean (SD) per cent of aggregated white blood cells in the peripheral blood was 8 (5) and 17 (10) respectively compared with controls 6 (4) (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the LAAT could effectively discriminate between various grades of disease activity, the values in patients with active disease being 13 (6)% in mild, 17 (10)% in moderate, and 26 (10)% in severe disease (p < 0.0001). Other acute phase reactants including the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the white blood cell count, the platelet count, neutrophil count, as well as, the C reactive protein concentration did not differentiate as well between the various groups. Using logistic regression analysis to differentiate between inflammatory bowel disease patients in remission or relapse, the LAAT was the single best indicator. The addition of any other test did not contribute to the discrimination. Among the different laboratory variables tested only the LAAT significantly discriminated between the five different subgroups of controls, remission and mild, moderate or severe disease activity.
本研究的目的是确定炎症标志物在评估炎症性肠病患者疾病活动度方面的相对有用性。通过梅奥诊所溃疡性结肠炎评分和哈维 - 布拉德肖克罗恩病评分来评估疾病活动度。500名无潜在炎症性疾病的正常献血者作为对照。测定每位患者的红细胞沉降率、血小板和白细胞计数、C反应蛋白以及白细胞黏附/聚集试验(LAAT)。124例炎症性肠病缓解期患者和128例复发期患者接受了检测。他们外周血中聚集白细胞的平均(标准差)百分比分别为8(5)和17(10),而对照组为6(4)(p < 0.0001)。此外,LAAT能够有效区分不同程度的疾病活动度,活动期疾病患者中,轻度为13(6)%,中度为17(10)%,重度为26(10)%(p < 0.0001)。包括红细胞沉降率、白细胞计数、血小板计数、中性粒细胞计数以及C反应蛋白浓度在内的其他急性期反应物在不同组之间的区分效果不佳。使用逻辑回归分析来区分炎症性肠病缓解期或复发期患者,LAAT是唯一最佳指标。添加任何其他检测均无助于区分。在所检测的不同实验室变量中,只有LAAT能显著区分对照组、缓解期以及轻度、中度或重度疾病活动度的五个不同亚组。