Suppr超能文献

胶原酶软膏与磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗浅度烧伤创面的愈合情况比较

Wound healing in partial-thickness burn wounds treated with collagenase ointment versus silver sulfadiazine cream.

作者信息

Hansbrough J F, Achauer B, Dawson J, Himel H, Luterman A, Slater H, Levenson S, Salzberg C A, Hansbrough W B, Doré C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego Medical Center 92103, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 May-Jun;16(3 Pt 1):241-7. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00004.

Abstract

During burn care the wounds must be repeatedly debrided of adherent and loose debris until the decision is made to surgically excise and graft the wound or to await epithelialization. Though native proteolytic enzymes in the skin or those produced by colonizing bacteria can speed eschar separation, the use of exogenous enzymes for wound debridement may accelerate wound cleaning and healing. Collagenase digests native and denatured collagen in necrotic tissue. This multicenter trial of 79 patients with partial-thickness wounds compared the efficacy of collagenase ointment applied with polymyxin B sulfate/bacitracin powder with the efficacy of standard topical antimicrobial therapy (control) in which silver sulfadiazine cream (1%) was used to debride paired burn sites. Patients selected for the study had two noncontiguous, partial-thickness, comparably sized, and anatomically similar burn wounds. Ages of patients ranged from 5 to 60 years (mean 33 years). The total body surface area burned ranged from 2% to 30% (mean 13.6%). Mean burn sizes used for study treatment were 366 cm2 (26 to 2310 cm2) for collagenase sites and 355 cm2 (26 to 2394 cm2) for control sites. Sites on each patient were randomly assigned to treatment with either collagenase or control. Endpoints were time to clean wound bed (absence of retained debris) and time to healing (complete epithelialization). The sites treated with collagenase cleaned in less time (mean 9.3 days) than the control sites (mean 11.6 days). Similarly the collagenase sites healed faster than the control sites (mean 19 vs 22.1 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在烧伤护理过程中,必须反复清除伤口上的粘连和松散碎屑,直到决定对伤口进行手术切除并植皮或等待上皮化。虽然皮肤中的天然蛋白水解酶或定植细菌产生的酶可加速焦痂分离,但使用外源性酶进行伤口清创可能会加速伤口清洁和愈合。胶原酶可消化坏死组织中的天然和变性胶原蛋白。这项针对79例浅度烧伤患者的多中心试验,比较了胶原酶软膏联合硫酸多粘菌素B/杆菌肽粉与标准局部抗菌治疗(对照组)(使用1%磺胺嘧啶银乳膏清创配对烧伤部位)的疗效。入选该研究的患者有两个不相邻、浅度、大小相当且解剖结构相似的烧伤伤口。患者年龄在5至60岁之间(平均33岁)。烧伤总面积在2%至30%之间(平均13.6%)。用于研究治疗的平均烧伤面积,胶原酶治疗部位为366平方厘米(26至2310平方厘米),对照部位为355平方厘米(26至2394平方厘米)。每位患者的伤口部位随机分配接受胶原酶或对照治疗。观察终点为伤口床清洁时间(无残留碎屑)和愈合时间(完全上皮化)。胶原酶治疗的伤口清洁时间(平均9.3天)比对照部位(平均11.6天)短。同样,胶原酶治疗部位的愈合速度也比对照部位快(平均19天对22.1天)。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验