Suppr超能文献

右心室舒张末期容积作为前负荷的一种测量指标。

Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a measure of preload.

作者信息

Durham R, Neunaber K, Vogler G, Shapiro M, Mazuski J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1995 Aug;39(2):218-23; discussion 223-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00006.

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) measured by a modified thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter has been proposed as an improved measure of cardiac preload, compared with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). This study compared the correlation of RVEDVI and PCWP with cardiac index (CI) to determine which parameter better reflected ventricular preload. Modified thermodilution catheters were placed in 38 critically ill patients. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded in these patients at 2- to 4-hour intervals for 1 to 7 days. Complete data sets (1,008) were obtained. Regression analysis was performed comparing PCWP, RVEDVI, RV ejection fraction (RVEF) to CI in the entire group and in individual patients. Because mathematical coupling may exist between RVEDVI and CI, the correlation between these variables was corrected for mathematical coupling using the method described by Stratton. Simple regression analysis of data from all patients, uncorrected for mathematical coupling, yielded a significant correlation between CI and RVEDVI (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), RVEF (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001), and PCWP (r = 0.01, p < 0.001). Correction for mathematical coupling between RVEDVI and CI resulted in a minor changes of the correlation coefficient to 0.56. In individual patients, a significant, uncorrected correlation (p < 0.05) was found between RVEDVI and CI in 27 of the 38 patients, whereas 11 patients had a significant correlation between PCWP and CI. RVEDVI correlated more closely with CI than did PCWP, even after correlation for mathematical coupling. In both the group as a whole and in individual patients, RVEDVI was a better indicator of cardiac preload.

摘要

与肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)相比,通过改良热稀释肺动脉导管测量的右心室舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVI)已被提议作为一种更好的心脏前负荷测量指标。本研究比较了RVEDVI和PCWP与心脏指数(CI)的相关性,以确定哪个参数能更好地反映心室前负荷。对38例危重病患者放置改良热稀释导管。在1至7天内,每隔2至4小时记录这些患者的血流动力学参数。共获得完整数据集(1008个)。对整个组和个体患者进行回归分析,比较PCWP、RVEDVI、右心室射血分数(RVEF)与CI的关系。由于RVEDVI和CI之间可能存在数学耦合,使用Stratton描述的方法对这些变量之间的相关性进行数学耦合校正。对所有患者的数据进行未校正数学耦合的简单回归分析,结果显示CI与RVEDVI(r = 0.60,p < 0.0001)、RVEF(r = 0.37,p < 0.0001)和PCWP(r = 0.01,p < 0.001)之间存在显著相关性。RVEDVI与CI之间数学耦合校正后,相关系数略有变化,变为0.56。在个体患者中,38例患者中有27例RVEDVI与CI之间存在显著的未校正相关性(p < 0.05),而11例患者PCWP与CI之间存在显著相关性。即使在进行数学耦合校正后,RVEDVI与CI的相关性仍比PCWP与CI的相关性更紧密。在整个组和个体患者中,RVEDVI都是更好的心脏前负荷指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验