Stevenson P, Sones K R, Gicheru M M, Mwangi E K
Kenya Trypanosomiasis Research Institute (KETRI), Kikuyu.
Acta Trop. 1995 May;59(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/0001-706x(94)00080-k.
The duration of prophylaxis provided by isometamidium chloride and homidium bromide, each at a dose rate of 1 mg kg-1 bodyweight, was compared in a 12-month field trial involving groups of 30 zebu cattle in south-west Kenya. The trial took place between February 1990 and February 1991 and included several months of high trypanosome challenge. Cattle in the prophylaxis groups were retreated on a group basis when 10% of the group had become infected since the previous group treatment. On this basis the mean intervals between retreatment were 7.5 +/- 1.9 and 4.6 +/- 2.1 weeks for the isometamidium and homidium groups, respectively. Weight gains in the two groups were similar. In spite of the need for more frequent treatment in the homidium group as compared to the isometamidium group, total drug costs were lower in the former. There was evidence of Trypanosoma congolense resistant to homidium and some evidence of T. vivax resistant to isometamidium.
在肯尼亚西南部进行的一项为期12个月的田间试验中,对剂量率均为1毫克/千克体重的氯异美啶和溴化百浪多息的预防持续时间进行了比较,试验涉及每组30头瘤牛。试验于1990年2月至1991年2月进行,其中包括几个月的高锥虫感染挑战期。当预防组中有10%的牛自上次组内治疗后被感染时,对该组牛进行再次治疗。在此基础上,异美啶组和百浪多息组再次治疗的平均间隔时间分别为7.5±1.9周和4.6±2.1周。两组牛的体重增加情况相似。尽管与异美啶组相比,百浪多息组需要更频繁地进行治疗,但前者的总药物成本较低。有证据表明刚果锥虫对百浪多息耐药,也有一些证据表明活泼锥虫对异美啶耐药。