Zenner H P, Ernst A
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;249(8):447-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00168852.
The present paper reviews possible molecular and cellular mechanisms in the cochlea that might contribute to tinnitus. They constitute a part of a highly integrated network in cochlear sound processing and are divided for easier understanding into three different models, i.e. active motor tinnitus, transduction tinnitus and signal-transfer tinnitus. Some of the steps of the pathophysiological models can even be pharmacologically influenced (as exemplified by experimental applications of lidocaine, calcium channel blocker, benzodiazepine, glutamate and atropine). This provides a rationale for the efficient suppression of tinnitus in some patients by these drugs. The most evident problem of all models in tinnitus, including the ones proposed in this paper, is the lack of objective verification by measurement. Thus, the well-defined clinical situation of each patient is hardly attributable to one of the models suggested. In addition, adequate therapy--perhaps one of the drugs considered--still cannot be based upon a reliable clinical finding.
本文综述了耳蜗中可能导致耳鸣的分子和细胞机制。它们构成了耳蜗声音处理高度整合网络的一部分,为便于理解分为三种不同模型,即主动运动性耳鸣、转导性耳鸣和信号传递性耳鸣。病理生理模型的一些步骤甚至可以受到药理学影响(如利多卡因、钙通道阻滞剂、苯二氮卓类、谷氨酸和阿托品的实验应用所示)。这为这些药物有效抑制部分患者耳鸣提供了理论依据。耳鸣的所有模型,包括本文提出的模型,最明显的问题是缺乏测量的客观验证。因此,很难将每个患者明确的临床情况归因于所提出的某一种模型。此外,适当的治疗——或许是所考虑的药物之一——仍然无法基于可靠的临床发现。