Harvey J C, Fleischman E H, Bellotti J E, Kagan A R
Department of Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles.
J Surg Oncol. 1993 Feb;52(2):101-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930520209.
Twenty-two patients were irradiated using two different dose schedules of intracavitary irradiation for palliation of locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus. Irradiation was given solely with either manually afterloaded low/intermediate dose Cesium-137 (LDR) or high dose rate Iridium-192 (HDR) delivered via remote afterloader. This study was designed to test the effectiveness of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in the relief of dysphagia and the maintenance of esophageal patency and to compare with our previous experiences with LDR intracavitary brachytherapy. Accelerated treatments were especially suited for patients with poor physical condition or short life expectancy unlikely to complete a full course of external beam irradiation without treatment interruption. Two thousand cGY in three fractions of LDR was compared with 1,250 cGY in one fraction HDR with essentially equal results.
22例患者接受了两种不同剂量方案的腔内照射,以缓解局部晚期或转移性食管癌的症状。照射仅采用手动后装低/中剂量铯-137(LDR)或通过遥控后装设备给予高剂量率铱-192(HDR)。本研究旨在测试HDR腔内近距离放疗缓解吞咽困难和维持食管通畅的有效性,并与我们之前LDR腔内近距离放疗的经验进行比较。加速治疗特别适合身体状况差或预期寿命短、不太可能在不中断治疗的情况下完成整个外照射疗程的患者。将LDR分三次给予2000 cGY与HDR一次给予1250 cGY进行比较,结果基本相同。