Suppr超能文献

两种用于检测产妇宫颈B族链球菌的快速检测方法的评估:酶联免疫吸附测定法和革兰氏染色法。

Evaluation of two rapid tests for detection of maternal endocervical group B streptococcus: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gram stain.

作者信息

Hagay Z J, Miskin A, Goldchmit R, Federman A, Matzkel A, Mogilner B M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):84-7.

PMID:7685873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the reliability of two rapid tests for detection of group B streptococcus, the new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the Gram stain. In addition, we wished to determine whether the combination of these tests would increase test sensitivity.

METHODS

During a 2-year period, cervical secretions from 660 patients who presented with either premature rupture of membranes or preterm labor at a gestational age of 37 weeks or less were tested by three methods: the Equate ELISA test, a Gram stain smear, and a culture for group B streptococcus. Results of the rapid tests were compared with the corresponding culture results.

RESULTS

Cultures were positive for group B streptococcus in 50 patients, a prevalence of 7.5%. The sensitivity for the Equate ELISA test was 24% and for the Gram stain, 20%. Specificity was 95 and 89%, respectively. When results of these tests were combined, the sensitivity increased to 26%. Both rapid tests yielded a high rate of false positives. In more than 50% of false-positive cases, bacteria other than group B streptococcus were isolated.

CONCLUSION

Neither the Gram stain nor the Equate ELISA test is sensitive enough to be used as a screening test for the identification of group B streptococcus. Furthermore, the combination of both rapid tests yielded only a slight increase in sensitivity. The high false-positive rate of the ELISA test seems to be related to a cross-reactivity of the anti-group B streptococcal antibody with other cervical bacteria.

摘要

目的

确定两种检测B族链球菌的快速检测方法——新型酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和革兰氏染色法的可靠性。此外,我们希望确定这两种检测方法联合使用是否会提高检测灵敏度。

方法

在两年时间里,采用三种方法对660例孕37周及以下出现胎膜早破或早产的患者的宫颈分泌物进行检测:Equate ELISA检测、革兰氏染色涂片以及B族链球菌培养。将快速检测结果与相应的培养结果进行比较。

结果

50例患者的培养结果显示B族链球菌呈阳性,患病率为7.5%。Equate ELISA检测的灵敏度为24%,革兰氏染色法的灵敏度为20%。特异性分别为95%和89%。当将这些检测结果联合使用时,灵敏度提高到26%。两种快速检测方法的假阳性率都很高。在超过50%的假阳性病例中,分离出的是B族链球菌以外的细菌。

结论

革兰氏染色法和Equate ELISA检测法都不够灵敏,不能用作筛查B族链球菌的检测方法。此外,两种快速检测方法联合使用时,灵敏度仅略有提高。ELISA检测的高假阳性率似乎与抗B族链球菌抗体与其他宫颈细菌的交叉反应有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验