Weyland A, Wietasch G, Hoeft A, Buhre W, Allgeier B, Weyland W, Kettler D
Zentrum Anaesthesiologie-, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Anaesthesist. 1995 Jan;44(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s001010050128.
Thermodilution measurements of cardiac output (CO) by means of Swan-Ganz catheters, in a strict sense, represent pulmonary arterial blood flow (PBF). In principle, this is also true in the presence of intracardiac left-to-right shunts due to atrial or ventricular septal defects. However, early recirculation of indicator may give rise to serious methodological problems in these cases. We sought to determine the influence of intracardiac left-to-right shunts on different devices for thermodilution measurements of CO using an extra-corporeal flow model. METHODS. Blood flow was regulated by means of a centrifugal pump that at the same time enabled complete mixing of the indicator after injection (Fig. 1). Pulmonary and systemic parts of the circulation were simulated using two membrane oxygenators and a systemic-venous reservoir to delay systemic recirculation of indicator. Control measurements of PBF (Qp) and systemic (Qs) blood flow were performed by calibrated electromagnetic flow-meters (EMF). Blood temperature was kept constant using a heat exchanger without altering the indicator mass balance in the pulmonary circulation. Left-to-right shunt was varied at different systemic flow levels applying a Qp:Qs ratio ranging from 1:1 to 2.5:1. Thermodilution measurements of PBF were performed using two different thermodilution catheters that were connected to commercially available CO computers. Additionally, thermodilution curves were recorded on a microcomputer and analysed with custom-made software that enabled iterative regression analyses of the initial decay to determine that part of the downslope that best fits a mono-exponentially declining function. Extrapolation of the thermodilution curve was then based on the respective curve segment in order to eliminate indicator recirculation due to shunt flow. RESULTS. At moderate left-to-right shunts (Qp:Qs < 2:1) all thermodilution measurements showed close agreement with control measurements. At higher shunt flows (Qp:Qs > or = 2:1), however, conventional extrapolation procedures of CO computers considerably underestimated PBF (Fig. 2). This was particularly true when a slow-response thermistor catheter was used (Fig. 3). The reason for this underestimation of Qp was an overestimation of the area under curve because of inadequate mathematical elimination of indicator recirculation by standard truncation methods (Fig. 4). However, curve-alert messages of the commercially implemented software did not occur. A high level of agreement could be consistently obtained using a fast-response thermistor together with individual definition of extrapolation limits according to logarithmic regression analyses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Under varying levels of left-to-right shunt, both the response time of thermodilution catheters and the algorithms for calculation of flow considerably influenced the validity of thermodilution measurements of PBF in an extracorporeal flow model. The use of computer-based regression analyses to define the optimal segment for monoexponential extrapolation could effectively eliminate indicator recirculation from the initial portion of the declining thermodilution curve and showed the closest agreement with EMF measurements of Qp. The quality of thermodilution curves with respect to recirculation peaks in the flow model was slightly better than in clinical routine. Nevertheless, the clinical applicability of the modified extrapolation algorithm could be illustrated during pulmonary thermodilution measurements in an exemplary patient with a ventricular septal defect (Fig. 5). PBF at extremely high shunt ratios, however, cannot be assessed by monoexponential extrapolation in principle (Fig. 6). Insufficient elimination of indicator recirculation resulted in flow values that closely resembled systemic rather than PBF. This finding is in accordance with a mathematical analysis of the underlying Steward-Hamilton equation if an infinite number of recirculations would be
严格意义上讲,通过 Swan - Ganz 导管进行的心输出量(CO)热稀释测量代表的是肺动脉血流量(PBF)。原则上,在存在因房间隔或室间隔缺损导致的心内左向右分流的情况下也是如此。然而,在这些情况下,指示剂的早期再循环可能会引发严重的方法学问题。我们试图使用体外血流模型来确定心内左向右分流对不同热稀释测量 CO 装置的影响。方法:通过离心泵调节血流,该泵同时能使注射后的指示剂完全混合(图 1)。使用两个膜式氧合器和一个体静脉储液器模拟循环的肺循环和体循环部分,以延迟指示剂的体循环再循环。通过校准的电磁流量计(EMF)对 PBF(Qp)和体循环(Qs)血流量进行对照测量。使用热交换器保持血液温度恒定,同时不改变肺循环中指示剂的质量平衡。在不同的体循环血流水平下,通过应用 1:1 至 2.5:1 的 Qp:Qs 比值来改变左向右分流。使用连接到市售 CO 计算机的两种不同热稀释导管进行 PBF 的热稀释测量。此外,在微型计算机上记录热稀释曲线,并使用定制软件进行分析,该软件能够对初始衰减进行迭代回归分析,以确定最适合单指数下降函数的下降斜率部分。然后根据相应的曲线段对热稀释曲线进行外推,以消除由于分流导致的指示剂再循环。结果:在中度左向右分流(Qp:Qs < 2:1)时,所有热稀释测量结果与对照测量结果显示出密切一致性。然而,在较高分流流量(Qp:Qs > 或 = 2:1)时,CO 计算机的传统外推程序显著低估了 PBF(图 2)。当使用慢响应热敏电阻导管时尤其如此(图 3)。Qp 被低估的原因是由于标准截断方法对指示剂再循环的数学消除不足,导致曲线下面积被高估(图 4)。然而,市售软件的曲线警报信息并未出现。使用快速响应热敏电阻并根据对数回归分析单独定义外推极限,可以始终获得高度一致性。讨论与结论:在不同程度的左向右分流情况下,热稀释导管的响应时间和流量计算算法均对体外血流模型中 PBF 热稀释测量的有效性产生显著影响。使用基于计算机的回归分析来定义单指数外推的最佳段,可以有效地从下降的热稀释曲线的初始部分消除指示剂再循环,并显示出与 Qp 的 EMF 测量结果最接近的一致性。在血流模型中,热稀释曲线关于再循环峰值的质量略优于临床常规情况。然而,在一名室间隔缺损的示例性患者的肺热稀释测量过程中,可以说明改良外推算法的临床适用性(图 5)。然而,原则上,在极高分流比时,PBF 无法通过单指数外推进行评估(图 6)。指示剂再循环消除不足导致的流量值与体循环流量而非 PBF 非常相似。如果存在无限多次再循环,这一发现与基础 Stewart - Hamilton 方程的数学分析一致。