Lewis R N, McElhaney R N, Pohle W, Mantsch H H
Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2367-75. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80723-4.
Previous vibrational spectroscopic studies of solid acyl-alkyl and diacyl phosphatidylcholines suggested that the sn1- and sn2-carbonyl stretching modes of 1,2-diacylglycerolipids have different absorption maxima. To address the assignment of sn1- and sn2-carbonyl stretching modes of hydrated 1,2-diacylglycerolipids, aqueous dispersions of 1-palmitoyl-2-hexadecyl phosphatidylcholine (PHPC), 1-hexadecyl-2-palmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (HPPC), 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), as well as hydrated samples of unlabeled, sn1-13C=O-labeled, sn2-13C=O-labeled, and doubly 13C=O-labeled dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) were examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The ester carbonyl stretching (nu C=O) bands of HPPC and PHPC each exhibit maxima near 1726 cm-1 and appear to be a summation of three subcomponents with maxima near 1740 cm-1, 1725 and 1705-1711 cm-1. In contrast, the nu C=O band of DPPC exhibits its maximum near 1733 cm-1 and appears to be a summation of two components centered near 1742 and 1727 cm-1. Thus the ester carbonyl group of the acyl-alkyl PCs appears to reside in a more polar environment than the ester carbonyl groups of their diacyl analogue. This observation implies that the polar/apolar interfaces of hydrated bilayers formed by PHPC and by HPPC are significantly different from that of DPPC and raises the question of whether the acyl-alkyl PCs are suitable models of their diacyl analogue. The absorption maximum of the nu C=O band of the doubly 13C=O-labeled DMPC occurs near 1691 cm-1 and those of its subcomponents occur near 1699 and 1685 cm-1. These frequencies are consistent with a 12C=0/13C0 'isotopic shift' of 42-43cm-1. snl - and snY2-13C0O-labeled DMPC each exhibit well resolved 12C and 13C vc-0 bands with absorption maxima near 1734 and 1692 cm-1, respectively. With both specifically 13C=O-labeled lipids, the 12C and 13C vo bands each seem to be a summation of subcomponents with absorption maxima near 1742 and 1727 cm-1 (12C vc=o) and 1699 and 1685 cm-1 (13C VC_o),regardless of whether the 13C=O-labeled fatty acyl chain is esterified at the snl - or sn2- positions of the glycerol backbone.We conclude that in hydrated 1,2-diacyl PC bilayers, the patterns of infrared absorption exhibited by ester carbonyl groups located at the primary and secondary positions of the glycerol backbone are similar. Also, the resolvable subcomponents of their v0 bands are each a summation of comparable contributions from both ester carbonyl groups and therefore cannot be attributed to the inequivalent locations of the two ester carbonyl groups. This result differs from that of the vibrational spectroscopic studies alluded to above and raises the question of whether data obtained in studies of dry (or poorly hydrated) lipids are applicable to fully hydrated lipid bilayers. To address questions of why the results of the two studies differ, we have also examined the vc=o bands of solid samples of DPPC, HPPC, and PHPC. We find that the vc-0 bands of all solid lipids studied differ from those of the hydrated samples. Moreover, with solid lipids the vc=o bands vary with the enantiomeric configuration,enantiomeric purity and thermal thermal history as well as with the way in which the sample was prepared. Also, although the vc=o bands of solid HPPC and PHPC vary significantly with sample preparation methodology, samples of PHPC and HPPCprepared by the same method exhibit very similar vC-0 absorption bands. We conclude as far as the organization of lipid polar/apolar interfaces is concerned, solid lipids are not good models of hydrated lipid bilayers and suggest that this may be largely responsible for the different conclusions drawn in this work and in previously published studies.
以往对固态酰基 - 烷基和二酰基磷脂酰胆碱的振动光谱研究表明,1,2 - 二酰基甘油脂质的sn1 - 和sn2 - 羰基伸缩模式具有不同的吸收最大值。为了确定水合1,2 - 二酰基甘油脂质的sn1 - 和sn2 - 羰基伸缩模式,我们通过傅里叶变换红外光谱对1 - 棕榈酰 - 2 - 十六烷基磷脂酰胆碱(PHPC)、1 - 十六烷基 - 2 - 棕榈酰磷脂酰胆碱(HPPC)、1,2 - 二棕榈酰磷脂酰胆碱(DPPC)的水分散体,以及未标记的、sn1 - 13C = O标记的、sn2 - 13C = O标记的和双13C = O标记的二肉豆蔻酰磷脂酰胆碱(DMPC)的水合样品进行了检测。HPPC和PHPC的酯羰基伸缩(νC = O)带在1726 cm-1附近均表现出最大值,并且似乎是三个子成分的总和,其最大值分别在1740 cm-1、1725和1705 - 1711 cm-1附近。相比之下;DPPC的νC = O带在1733 cm-1附近表现出最大值,并且似乎是两个以1742和1727 cm-1为中心的成分的总和。因此,酰基 - 烷基磷脂酰胆碱的酯羰基似乎比其二酰基类似物的酯羰基处于更具极性的环境中。这一观察结果表明,由PHPC和HPPC形成的水合双层膜的极性/非极性界面与DPPC的显著不同,并提出了酰基 - 烷基磷脂酰胆碱是否是其二酰基类似物的合适模型的问题。双13C = O标记的DMPC的νC = O带的吸收最大值出现在1691 cm-1附近,其子成分的吸收最大值出现在1699和1685 cm-1附近。这些频率与42 - 43cm-(12C = 0/13C0 “同位素位移”)一致。sn1 - 和snY2 - 13C0O标记的DMPC均表现出分辨率良好的12C和13C νc - 0带,其吸收最大值分别在1734和1692 cm-1附近。对于这两种特定的13C = O标记的脂质,12C和13C νo带似乎均是子成分的总和,其吸收最大值分别在1742和1727 cm-1(12C νc = o)以及1699和1685 cm-1(13C νC_o)附近,而与13C = O标记的脂肪酰链是在甘油主链的sn1 - 还是sn2 - 位置酯化无关。我们得出结论,在水合1,2 - 二酰基磷脂酰胆碱双层膜中,位于甘油主链一级和二级位置的酯羰基所表现出的红外吸收模式相似。此外,它们的ν0带的可分辨子成分均是来自两个酯羰基的可比贡献的总和,因此不能归因于两个酯羰基的不等价位置。这一结果与上述振动光谱研究的结果不同,并提出了在干燥(或水合不良)脂质研究中获得的数据是否适用于完全水合脂质双层膜的问题。为了解决两项研究结果为何不同的问题,我们还检测了DPPC、HPPC和PHPC固体样品的νc = o带。我们发现,所研究的所有固体脂质的νc - 0带均与水合样品的不同。此外,对于固体脂质,νc = o带随对映体构型、对映体纯度和热历史以及样品制备方式而变化。而且,尽管固体HPPC和PHPC的νc = o带随样品制备方法有显著变化,但通过相同方法制备的PHPC和HPPC样品表现出非常相似的νC - 0吸收带。我们得出结论,就脂质极性/非极性界面的组织而言,固体脂质不是水合脂质双层膜的良好模型,并表明这可能在很大程度上导致了本研究和先前发表的研究得出不同结论的原因。