• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估坦纳-怀特豪斯2期骨龄的计算机化图像分析系统。

A computerized image analysis system for estimating Tanner-Whitehouse 2 bone age.

作者信息

Tanner J M, Gibbons R D

机构信息

Institute of Education, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Horm Res. 1994;42(6):282-7. doi: 10.1159/000184210.

DOI:10.1159/000184210
PMID:7698725
Abstract

A method for assigning Tanner-Whitehouse 2 skeletal maturity scores (or bone ages) to hand-wrist X-rays by an image analysis computer system is described. An operator positions the relevant area of the X-ray on a light box beneath a video camera. Correct positioning is assured by computer templates of each bone stage. Thereafter the process is automatic; the computer, not the operator, rates the bones. The system produces continuous stage scores, not discrete ones such as B, C or D. Data are given which show that the computer-assisted skeletal age score is more repeatable than the usual manual (or unassisted) rating. The absolute difference between duplicates averaged 0.25 stages; differences of as much as 1.0 stage occurred in only 3% of duplicates compared with 15% obtained in manual ratings.

摘要

描述了一种通过图像分析计算机系统对手腕X射线片进行坦纳-怀特豪斯2型骨骼成熟度评分(或骨龄)的方法。操作人员将X射线的相关区域放置在摄像机下方的灯箱上。每个骨阶段的计算机模板确保了正确的定位。此后该过程是自动的;由计算机而非操作人员对骨骼进行评分。该系统产生的是连续阶段评分,而非诸如B、C或D这样的离散评分。给出的数据表明,计算机辅助的骨骼年龄评分比常规的手动(或无辅助)评分更具可重复性。重复测量之间的绝对差异平均为0.25个阶段;重复测量中差异高达1.0个阶段的情况仅占3%,而手动评分中这一比例为15%。

相似文献

1
A computerized image analysis system for estimating Tanner-Whitehouse 2 bone age.一种用于评估坦纳-怀特豪斯2期骨龄的计算机化图像分析系统。
Horm Res. 1994;42(6):282-7. doi: 10.1159/000184210.
2
Automatic bone age measurement using computerized image analysis.使用计算机图像分析进行自动骨龄测量。
J Pediatr Endocrinol. 1994 Apr-Jun;7(2):141-5. doi: 10.1515/jpem.1994.7.2.141.
3
Reliability and validity of computer-assisted estimates of Tanner-Whitehouse skeletal maturity (CASAS): comparison with the manual method.计算机辅助的坦纳-怀特豪斯骨骼成熟度评估(CASAS)的可靠性和有效性:与手工方法的比较。
Horm Res. 1994;42(6):288-94. doi: 10.1159/000184211.
4
Assessment of bone ages by the Tanner-Whitehouse method using a computer-aided system.使用计算机辅助系统通过坦纳-怀特豪斯方法评估骨龄。
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1994 Dec;406:77-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13429.x.
5
Tanner-Whitehouse method of assessing skeletal maturity: problems and common errors.坦纳-怀特豪斯骨骼成熟度评估方法:问题与常见错误
Horm Res. 1996;45 Suppl 2:53-5. doi: 10.1159/000184848.
6
Standardization of the Tanner-Whitehouse bone age method in the context of automated image analysis.在自动图像分析背景下的坦纳-怀特豪斯骨龄测定法的标准化
Ann Hum Biol. 2012 Jan;39(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2011.642405. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity.用于自动确定骨骼成熟度的BoneXpert方法。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jan;28(1):52-66. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.926067.
8
Automatic bone age assessment based on intelligent algorithms and comparison with TW3 method.基于智能算法的骨龄自动评估及与TW3方法的比较
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2008 Dec;32(8):678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
9
Preliminary report on the validation of a grammar-based computer system for assessing skeletal maturity with the Tanner-Whitehouse 2 method.基于语法的计算机系统运用坦纳-怀特豪斯2法评估骨骼成熟度的验证初步报告。
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1994 Dec;406:84-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13431.x.
10
The use of a computerized method of bone age assessment in clinical practice.计算机化骨龄评估方法在临床实践中的应用。
Horm Res. 1995;44 Suppl 3:2-7. doi: 10.1159/000184665.

引用本文的文献

1
Computer Assisted Bone Age Estimation Using Dimensions of Metacarpal Bones and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Based on Neural Network.基于神经网络的利用掌骨和掌指关节尺寸进行计算机辅助骨龄估计
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Mar 1;25(1):51-58. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.95629.1882. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Bone age assessment based on three-dimensional ultrasound and artificial intelligence compared with paediatrician-read radiographic bone age: protocol for a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study.基于三维超声和人工智能的骨龄评估与儿科医生阅片评估骨龄的比较:一项前瞻性、诊断准确性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 24;14(2):e079969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079969.
3
Traditional and New Methods of Bone Age Assessment-An Overview.
传统与新型骨龄评估方法概述
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2021 Aug 23;13(3):251-262. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2020.2020.0091. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Effects of Hypertension, Diabetes, and Smoking on Age and Sex Prediction from Retinal Fundus Images.高血压、糖尿病和吸烟对视网膜眼底图像年龄和性别预测的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 12;10(1):4623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61519-9.
5
Correlation between Skeletal Age and Metacarpal Bones and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Dimensions.骨骼年龄与掌骨及掌指关节尺寸之间的相关性
J Dent (Shiraz). 2019 Sep;20(3):159-164. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44904.
6
Reliability of the Greulich and Pyle method for chronological age estimation and age majority prediction in a Spanish sample.西班牙样本中格吕利希和派尔方法用于实足年龄估计及法定年龄预测的可靠性。
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):1139-1149. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1760-x. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
7
Automated bone age assessment: motivation, taxonomies, and challenges.自动化骨龄评估:动机、分类和挑战。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:391626. doi: 10.1155/2013/391626. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
The digital atlas of skeletal maturity by Gilsanz and Ratib: a suitable alternative for age estimation of living individuals in criminal proceedings?吉尔赞和拉蒂布的骨骼成熟度数字图谱:在刑事诉讼中对活体个体进行年龄估计的合适替代方法?
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Nov;123(6):489-94. doi: 10.1007/s00414-009-0367-2. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
9
Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature.自动化格-派骨龄测定在矮小儿童中的临床应用
Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Jun;39(6):598-607. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1114-4. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
10
Computer-aided estimation of skeletal age and comparison with bone age evaluations by the method of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse.计算机辅助骨骼年龄估计以及与格雷厄姆 - 派尔法和坦纳 - 怀特豪斯法的骨龄评估结果比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(3):226-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01405306.