Sutton L D, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):146-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.146-148.1995.
A predictor panel of 300 clinical bacterial isolates (200 resistant to ciprofloxacin) was used to compare 5-micrograms disk diffusion test results with the MICs of ofloxacin (control), levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Regression analysis demonstrated high correlations between the methods for all three fluoroquinolones (r > or = 0.95). In order to minimize disk diffusion testing errors among the fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, the following modifications to previously proposed or published interpretive criteria were suggested: for levofloxacin, susceptible at > or = 17 mm (< or = 2 micrograms/ml) and resistant at < or = 13 mm (> or = 8 micrograms/ml); for sparfloxacin, susceptible at > or = 20 mm (< or = 1 microgram/ml) and resistant at < or = 16 mm (> or = 4 micrograms/ml). The study control drug, ofloxacin, did not appear to possess a significant error rate (5% minor error) when fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were tested, and no modifications were proposed. Under these proposed interpretive criteria, the absolute categorical agreements between standardized susceptibility testing methods for levofloxacin and sparfloxacin results were 91.3 and 94.0%, respectively (< or = 0.3% major errors and nil very major errors).
使用一个包含300株临床细菌分离株(其中200株对环丙沙星耐药)的预测性样本,将5微克纸片扩散试验结果与氧氟沙星(对照)、左氧氟沙星和司帕沙星的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)进行比较。回归分析表明,这三种氟喹诺酮类药物的方法之间具有高度相关性(r≥0.95)。为了尽量减少耐氟喹诺酮类菌株之间的纸片扩散试验误差,建议对先前提出或发表的解释标准进行以下修改:对于左氧氟沙星,抑菌圈直径≥17毫米(MIC≤2微克/毫升)为敏感,抑菌圈直径≤13毫米(MIC≥8微克/毫升)为耐药;对于司帕沙星,抑菌圈直径≥20毫米(MIC≤1微克/毫升)为敏感,抑菌圈直径≤16毫米(MIC≥4微克/毫升)为耐药。研究中的对照药物氧氟沙星在检测耐氟喹诺酮类菌株时似乎没有显著的误差率(5%的小误差),因此未提出修改建议。根据这些提议的解释标准,左氧氟沙星和司帕沙星结果的标准化药敏试验方法之间的绝对分类一致性分别为91.3%和94.0%(主要误差≤0.3%,无非常大的误差)。