Suppr超能文献

贻贝中的腹泻性贝类毒素:检测方法比较及净化效果测定

Diarrhetic shellfish poison in mussels: comparison of methods of detection and determination of the effectiveness of depuration.

作者信息

Croci L, Toti L, De Medici D, Cozzi L

机构信息

Laboratorio Alimenti, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Dec;24(1-2):337-42. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90132-5.

Abstract

The lack of specificity of the Yasumoto mouse bioassay for Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) toxin and the possibility of obtaining false positive results, prompted a search for a suitable method to confirm doubtful results. The mouse bioassay, an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and a tissue culture bioassay were compared; in addition the efficiency of depuration of toxic mussels in ozonized water was evaluated. DSP assay using tissue cultures was found suitable for confirming results obtained using the mouse bioassay, particularly where interpretation was difficult. The ELISA kit gave satisfactory results, but it responded only to okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin 1. Depuration reduced toxicity in some cases after 3 days of treatment.

摘要

矢本小鼠生物测定法对腹泻性贝类毒素(DSP)缺乏特异性,且有可能得出假阳性结果,这促使人们寻找一种合适的方法来确认可疑结果。对小鼠生物测定法、酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和组织培养生物测定法进行了比较;此外,还评估了臭氧处理水中有毒贻贝的净化效率。发现使用组织培养进行DSP测定适合确认通过小鼠生物测定法获得的结果,特别是在结果难以解释的情况下。ELISA试剂盒给出了令人满意的结果,但它仅对冈田酸和鳍藻毒素-1有反应。处理3天后,净化在某些情况下降低了毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验