Guidotti T L
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton, Canada.
Public Health Rev. 1994;22(3-4):235-50.
Environmental and occupational epidemiology are in the tradition of "critical science." Critical science is a mode of science in which scientific methods are used to critique the adverse consequences of technological development. Critical science should be explicitly recognized as a paradigm in interdisciplinary research. It is the "mode" in which environmental and occupational epidemiology function and the role that these and related disciplines play in society. As the feedback to society on the performance of technology, critical science has assumed a major role in modern society by providing an acceptable critique of technological development. The close association between scientific research and technology of the last three and one-half centuries has been the exception to the historical rule. Intelligent guidance of technology in modern society makes public participation and education in scientific, biomedical, and technical affairs imperative. Critical science in its interdisciplinary dimension is imperative to this public process. Truly interdisciplinary work can only be accomplished when the disciplinary underpinnings are strong and when individual investigators are encouraged to pursue their individual priorities. Critical science is no exception and requires encouragement of skepticism on the part of the investigator toward conventional assumptions.
环境与职业流行病学属于“批判性科学”的传统范畴。批判性科学是一种科学模式,其中科学方法被用于审视技术发展的不利后果。批判性科学应被明确视为跨学科研究中的一种范式。它是环境与职业流行病学发挥作用的“模式”,以及这些学科和相关学科在社会中所扮演的角色。作为对技术性能的社会反馈,批判性科学通过对技术发展提供可接受的批评,在现代社会中发挥了重要作用。过去三个半世纪以来,科学研究与技术之间的紧密联系是历史规律的一个例外。现代社会中对技术的明智引导使得公众参与以及对科学、生物医学和技术事务的教育变得势在必行。批判性科学在其跨学科层面对于这一公众进程至关重要。只有当学科基础坚实且鼓励个体研究者追求各自的优先事项时,真正的跨学科工作才能完成。批判性科学也不例外,需要鼓励研究者对传统假设持怀疑态度。